The lack of transparency on the X platform (formerly Twitter) regarding racism and bigotry against Kamala Harris is a significant concern.
By Hugo Keji

Reasons for Lack of Transparency:-
Inconsistent Policy Enforcement-

X has community guidelines that prohibit hate speech, but enforcement can be inconsistent. Reports of racist or bigoted content may not always result in action, leading to perceptions of bias or negligence.

Algorithmic Prioritization:-
Algorithms designed to maximize engagement often promote provocative content, including hate speech, because it generates strong reactions. This prioritization can overshadow the moderation of harmful content.

Profit Motives:- Greed is Good

Social media platforms derive revenue from user engagement. Content that sparks controversy or strong emotions can drive more traffic, making platforms reluctant to fully crack down on such content despite its harmful nature.

Challenges in Content Moderation-
Moderating content at scale is challenging. Automated systems can miss context-specific nuances, while human moderators may be overwhelmed by the volume of content or lack the necessary training to identify subtle forms of racism and bigotry.

Political Pressure-
Social media platforms can face pressure from various political groups. Being transparent about content moderation practices might expose platforms to backlash from those who believe their political views are being unfairly targeted.

Lack of Accountability-
Without external accountability, social media companies may not feel compelled to improve their transparency. There are limited regulatory frameworks that mandate clear reporting on how hate speech is managed.

Impacts of Lack of Transparency:-

Erosion of Trust-
Users lose trust in the platform when they see that hate speech and bigotry are not being adequately addressed. This can lead to decreased user engagement and a migration to other platforms.

Amplification of Hate Speech-
Without transparent moderation, harmful content can spread unchecked, normalizing racism and bigotry. This can have real-world consequences, inciting further discrimination and violence.

Impact on Victims-
Targets of hate speech, like Kamala Harris, may face increased psychological stress and threats to their safety. The lack of action by the platform can be perceived as tacit approval of the harassment.

Polarization and Division-
The spread of unchecked hate speech contributes to societal polarization. Echo chambers form, reinforcing extreme views and diminishing opportunities for constructive dialogue.

Potential Solutions:-
Clearer Reporting Mechanisms-
Implementing more straightforward and user-friendly reporting tools can help users flag harmful content more effectively.
Regular Transparency Reports

Publishing regular transparency reports detailing how many reports of hate speech were received, how many were acted upon, and the outcomes can build trust.

Enhanced Moderation Practices-
Investing in better training for human moderators and improving AI systems to understand context can lead to more effective content moderation.

Independent Audits-
Conducting independent audits of content moderation practices can hold platforms accountable and provide recommendations for improvement.

Regulatory Oversight-
Government regulations that require social media platforms to disclose their content moderation practices and outcomes can ensure greater accountability.

With these issues, the X platform can foster a more transparent and inclusive environment, reducing the prevalence of racism and bigotry against public figures like Kamala Harris.

App link: FREE for download... https://www.amazon.com/dp/...