3 hours ago
Build your own freelance marketplace with a fully customizable #FiverrCloneScript . Designed to support the fast-growing #GigEconomy , this solution comes with an intuitive interface, #SecurePaymentIntegration , and powerful features that benefit both #Freelancers and #Clients .
From service listings, project management, and in-app communication to ratings, reviews, and dispute resolution, this platform has everything you need to create a smooth and professional #FreelanceMarketplace .
Whether you’re looking to launch a niche talent hub or a large-scale gig platform, the #FiverrClone makes it possible to scale quickly while ensuring a seamless user experience.
https://oyelabs.com/fiverr...
From service listings, project management, and in-app communication to ratings, reviews, and dispute resolution, this platform has everything you need to create a smooth and professional #FreelanceMarketplace .
Whether you’re looking to launch a niche talent hub or a large-scale gig platform, the #FiverrClone makes it possible to scale quickly while ensuring a seamless user experience.
https://oyelabs.com/fiverr...
25 days ago
Is the World and mainstream media Rewarding Hamas for Its Atrocities and condemning Israel for defending itself? (Part1)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
HAMAS SURRENDER NOW- WAR GOES ON UNTIL HAMAS SURRENDER.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The claim that the world and mainstream media are "rewarding Hamas" and "condemning Israel for defending itself" is a highly contentious issue with various perspectives. An analysis of global media coverage and international responses reveals a complex landscape.
Regarding media coverage:
Accusations of Bias: There are widespread and often opposing accusations of bias in media coverage of the conflict. Some critics argue that Western mainstream media often downplays Palestinian suffering and disproportionately focuses on Israeli narratives, while others contend that the media is overly critical of Israel and presents a one-sided view that favors the Palestinian cause.
Differing Terminology: The language used by media outlets is a frequent point of contention. Some outlets have been criticized for using more emotive language like "massacre" or "slaughter" when describing Israeli casualties, but not when reporting on Palestinian deaths.
Access and Censorship: Israel has been criticized for imposing restrictions on international journalists' access to Gaza, leading many news organizations to rely on local Palestinian journalists and freelancers. This has raised concerns about the ability of the media to provide a complete and unfiltered picture of events.
Focus on Humanitarian Crisis: A significant portion of recent media coverage has focused on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, including reports of starvation and the high number of civilian casualties. This has led to international condemnation of Israel's military actions and calls for a ceasefire.
Regarding international responses:
Initial Condemnation of Hamas: Following the initial attacks by Hamas, many countries, particularly Western nations, strongly condemned the actions of Hamas, expressed solidarity with Israel, and affirmed Israel's right to self-defense.
Growing Criticism of Israel: As the conflict has progressed, a growing number of countries and international bodies have become increasingly critical of Israel's military campaign. This criticism is often linked to the high number of Palestinian casualties, the humanitarian situation, and Israeli military plans for Gaza.
Calls for a Ceasefire: The United Nations and many countries have repeatedly called for a ceasefire or a humanitarian pause. These calls are often driven by concerns about civilian lives and the unfolding humanitarian crisis.
Lack of a Unified "International Community": It's important to note that there isn't a single "international community" with a unified voice. Responses to the conflict vary widely, with different countries and organizations taking diverse positions based on their political alignments, historical ties, and domestic public opinion.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The question of why various groups are not calling for Hamas to surrender and release all hostages, dead or alive, is complex and has multiple facets. While many countries and international bodies have indeed made such calls, there are several reasons why this is not a universally adopted or consistently emphasized position.
1. The "All or Nothing" Stance of the Parties Involved:
Hamas's Position: Hamas has consistently stated that a full release of hostages is contingent on a permanent ceasefire, the complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza, and the release of a large number of Palestinian prisoners. For Hamas, the hostages are a primary bargaining chip to achieve its political and military objectives. From its perspective, surrendering and releasing hostages without these concessions would be a complete loss and negate its strategic advantage.
Israel's Position: Israel's stated war aims have been the destruction of Hamas's military and governing capabilities and the return of all hostages. However, some critics argue that Israel's actions, such as rejecting certain ceasefire proposals and expanding military operations, have not always prioritized the return of hostages, suggesting that other goals like territorial control or the "dismantling" of Hamas are also major drivers. The Israeli government has been criticized for not accepting deals that would secure hostage release in exchange for ending military operations, with some claiming that this demonstrates that the return of hostages is not its central priority.
2. The Role of Ceasefire Negotiations:
Mediated Diplomacy: The focus of many international actors, including the United States, Qatar, and Egypt, has been on brokering a ceasefire deal that includes a phased release of hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners and a temporary pause in fighting. This approach is seen as a more realistic path to securing the hostages' release than demanding an unconditional surrender, which Hamas has repeatedly rejected. The goal is to create a pathway for de-escalation and humanitarian aid, not to achieve a total military victory for one side.
Hamas's Perceived Leverage: For many international observers, a call for an unconditional surrender is seen as an unrealistic demand that would likely be ignored by Hamas. This is because the group views the hostages as its most valuable asset in the negotiation process. Many believe that such a call would not only be ineffective but could also prolong the conflict and endanger the lives of the remaining hostages.
3. Political and Public Opinion Dynamics:
Diverse Views on the Conflict: The international community is not a monolith. Different countries have different relationships with Israel and the Palestinians, and their domestic political landscapes shape their official positions. Many countries that are critical of Israel's military actions are more inclined to call for an immediate and permanent ceasefire, which they believe is the only way to alleviate the humanitarian crisis, rather than focusing solely on a call for Hamas's surrender.
Differing Objectives: While many people around the world want to see the hostages released, many also believe that the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the long-term conflict are the more pressing issues. As a result, their calls for action are focused on a cessation of hostilities and the delivery of aid, rather than a demand for Hamas's surrender. Some observers believe that Hamas's actions, while condemned, have strategically brought the Palestinian cause back to the forefront of global conversation, which for some is a more significant development than the group's surrender.
In short, while calls for Hamas to release the hostages are indeed made by many, the absence of a universal call for unconditional surrender is a reflection of the complex realities on the ground, the perceived futility of such a demand, the strategic priorities of the key actors, and the diverse perspectives within the international community regarding the conflict.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
HAMAS SURRENDER NOW- WAR GOES ON UNTIL HAMAS SURRENDER.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The claim that the world and mainstream media are "rewarding Hamas" and "condemning Israel for defending itself" is a highly contentious issue with various perspectives. An analysis of global media coverage and international responses reveals a complex landscape.
Regarding media coverage:
Accusations of Bias: There are widespread and often opposing accusations of bias in media coverage of the conflict. Some critics argue that Western mainstream media often downplays Palestinian suffering and disproportionately focuses on Israeli narratives, while others contend that the media is overly critical of Israel and presents a one-sided view that favors the Palestinian cause.
Differing Terminology: The language used by media outlets is a frequent point of contention. Some outlets have been criticized for using more emotive language like "massacre" or "slaughter" when describing Israeli casualties, but not when reporting on Palestinian deaths.
Access and Censorship: Israel has been criticized for imposing restrictions on international journalists' access to Gaza, leading many news organizations to rely on local Palestinian journalists and freelancers. This has raised concerns about the ability of the media to provide a complete and unfiltered picture of events.
Focus on Humanitarian Crisis: A significant portion of recent media coverage has focused on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, including reports of starvation and the high number of civilian casualties. This has led to international condemnation of Israel's military actions and calls for a ceasefire.
Regarding international responses:
Initial Condemnation of Hamas: Following the initial attacks by Hamas, many countries, particularly Western nations, strongly condemned the actions of Hamas, expressed solidarity with Israel, and affirmed Israel's right to self-defense.
Growing Criticism of Israel: As the conflict has progressed, a growing number of countries and international bodies have become increasingly critical of Israel's military campaign. This criticism is often linked to the high number of Palestinian casualties, the humanitarian situation, and Israeli military plans for Gaza.
Calls for a Ceasefire: The United Nations and many countries have repeatedly called for a ceasefire or a humanitarian pause. These calls are often driven by concerns about civilian lives and the unfolding humanitarian crisis.
Lack of a Unified "International Community": It's important to note that there isn't a single "international community" with a unified voice. Responses to the conflict vary widely, with different countries and organizations taking diverse positions based on their political alignments, historical ties, and domestic public opinion.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The question of why various groups are not calling for Hamas to surrender and release all hostages, dead or alive, is complex and has multiple facets. While many countries and international bodies have indeed made such calls, there are several reasons why this is not a universally adopted or consistently emphasized position.
1. The "All or Nothing" Stance of the Parties Involved:
Hamas's Position: Hamas has consistently stated that a full release of hostages is contingent on a permanent ceasefire, the complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza, and the release of a large number of Palestinian prisoners. For Hamas, the hostages are a primary bargaining chip to achieve its political and military objectives. From its perspective, surrendering and releasing hostages without these concessions would be a complete loss and negate its strategic advantage.
Israel's Position: Israel's stated war aims have been the destruction of Hamas's military and governing capabilities and the return of all hostages. However, some critics argue that Israel's actions, such as rejecting certain ceasefire proposals and expanding military operations, have not always prioritized the return of hostages, suggesting that other goals like territorial control or the "dismantling" of Hamas are also major drivers. The Israeli government has been criticized for not accepting deals that would secure hostage release in exchange for ending military operations, with some claiming that this demonstrates that the return of hostages is not its central priority.
2. The Role of Ceasefire Negotiations:
Mediated Diplomacy: The focus of many international actors, including the United States, Qatar, and Egypt, has been on brokering a ceasefire deal that includes a phased release of hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners and a temporary pause in fighting. This approach is seen as a more realistic path to securing the hostages' release than demanding an unconditional surrender, which Hamas has repeatedly rejected. The goal is to create a pathway for de-escalation and humanitarian aid, not to achieve a total military victory for one side.
Hamas's Perceived Leverage: For many international observers, a call for an unconditional surrender is seen as an unrealistic demand that would likely be ignored by Hamas. This is because the group views the hostages as its most valuable asset in the negotiation process. Many believe that such a call would not only be ineffective but could also prolong the conflict and endanger the lives of the remaining hostages.
3. Political and Public Opinion Dynamics:
Diverse Views on the Conflict: The international community is not a monolith. Different countries have different relationships with Israel and the Palestinians, and their domestic political landscapes shape their official positions. Many countries that are critical of Israel's military actions are more inclined to call for an immediate and permanent ceasefire, which they believe is the only way to alleviate the humanitarian crisis, rather than focusing solely on a call for Hamas's surrender.
Differing Objectives: While many people around the world want to see the hostages released, many also believe that the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the long-term conflict are the more pressing issues. As a result, their calls for action are focused on a cessation of hostilities and the delivery of aid, rather than a demand for Hamas's surrender. Some observers believe that Hamas's actions, while condemned, have strategically brought the Palestinian cause back to the forefront of global conversation, which for some is a more significant development than the group's surrender.
In short, while calls for Hamas to release the hostages are indeed made by many, the absence of a universal call for unconditional surrender is a reflection of the complex realities on the ground, the perceived futility of such a demand, the strategic priorities of the key actors, and the diverse perspectives within the international community regarding the conflict.
1 yr. ago
What role do startups and the gig economy play in reducing unemployment?
By Ugo Ikeji
Startups and the gig economy have become increasingly influential in shaping the modern workforce, playing significant roles in reducing unemployment.
Role of Startups in Reducing Unemployment
1. Job Creation
Startups are known for their rapid growth and innovation, leading to the creation of new job opportunities.
Unlike established companies, startups often expand quickly and require a diverse range of skills and talents.
New Positions: Startups often create jobs that didn’t exist before, ranging from technical roles in software development to creative positions in marketing.
Local Employment: They contribute to local economies by creating jobs in communities that may otherwise lack significant employment opportunities.
2. Innovation and New Markets
Startups drive innovation, which can lead to the development of new industries and markets.
Tech and Non-Tech Sectors: While tech startups are the most visible, many non-tech startups also create jobs in fields like healthcare, education, and environmental services.
Ancillary Jobs: The growth of startups can lead to ancillary job creation in supporting industries, such as logistics, legal services, and retail.
3. Flexibility and Diversity
Startups often offer flexible working conditions, attracting a diverse workforce including part-time workers, freelancers, and remote employees.
Inclusive Employment: This flexibility can provide job opportunities for individuals who may struggle with traditional 9-to-5 roles, such as parents, students, and people with disabilities.
Skills Development: Working in startups can offer extensive learning opportunities, helping employees develop a broad skill set that enhances their future employability.
Role of the Gig Economy in Reducing Unemployment
1. Immediate Employment Opportunities
The gig economy provides quick and accessible job opportunities for those in need of immediate income.
Low Entry Barriers: Platforms like Uber, TaskRabbit, and Fiverr offer jobs that often require minimal qualifications or upfront investment.
Short-Term Income: Gig work can provide a temporary solution for those who are unemployed, helping them earn money while searching for permanent positions.
2. Supplemental Income
For many, the gig economy offers a way to supplement their income from traditional employment.
Part-Time Gigs: Individuals can take on gig work outside of their regular jobs to earn additional income, helping them manage economic instability.
Diverse Opportunities: Gig work spans various fields including delivery services, freelance writing, graphic design, and home repairs, allowing workers to find gigs that match their skills.
3. Empowerment of Independent Workers
The gig economy empowers individuals to become their own bosses, promoting entrepreneurship and self-employment.
Control Over Workload: Gig workers can choose the amount of work they take on, which helps in balancing personal and professional lives.
Skill Utilization: It allows individuals to monetize a wide range of skills, from driving and tutoring to creative and technical abilities.
Combined Impact on Unemployment Reduction
1. Dynamic and Resilient Workforce
The synergy between startups and the gig economy contributes to a dynamic and resilient workforce.
Adaptability: Workers can transition between gig work and startup employment, gaining varied experience and reducing long-term unemployment risks.
Economic Resilience: During economic downturns, the flexibility of the gig economy and the innovative nature of startups can provide alternative employment options, mitigating the impact of job losses in traditional sectors.
2. Support for Economic Growth
Both startups and the gig economy play crucial roles in stimulating economic growth.
Increased Productivity: Startups often introduce efficiencies and new technologies that increase overall productivity.
Consumption and Demand: As people gain employment through startups and gig work, their increased purchasing power stimulates demand for goods and services, further driving economic growth.
Conclusion
Startups and the gig economy significantly contribute to reducing unemployment by creating diverse job opportunities, fostering innovation, and providing flexible work arrangements. Their roles in offering immediate employment, supplementing incomes, and empowering independent workers are vital in today’s evolving economic landscape.
Through these mechanisms, they not only address unemployment but also drive broader economic growth and resilience.
By Ugo Ikeji
Startups and the gig economy have become increasingly influential in shaping the modern workforce, playing significant roles in reducing unemployment.
Role of Startups in Reducing Unemployment
1. Job Creation
Startups are known for their rapid growth and innovation, leading to the creation of new job opportunities.
Unlike established companies, startups often expand quickly and require a diverse range of skills and talents.
New Positions: Startups often create jobs that didn’t exist before, ranging from technical roles in software development to creative positions in marketing.
Local Employment: They contribute to local economies by creating jobs in communities that may otherwise lack significant employment opportunities.
2. Innovation and New Markets
Startups drive innovation, which can lead to the development of new industries and markets.
Tech and Non-Tech Sectors: While tech startups are the most visible, many non-tech startups also create jobs in fields like healthcare, education, and environmental services.
Ancillary Jobs: The growth of startups can lead to ancillary job creation in supporting industries, such as logistics, legal services, and retail.
3. Flexibility and Diversity
Startups often offer flexible working conditions, attracting a diverse workforce including part-time workers, freelancers, and remote employees.
Inclusive Employment: This flexibility can provide job opportunities for individuals who may struggle with traditional 9-to-5 roles, such as parents, students, and people with disabilities.
Skills Development: Working in startups can offer extensive learning opportunities, helping employees develop a broad skill set that enhances their future employability.
Role of the Gig Economy in Reducing Unemployment
1. Immediate Employment Opportunities
The gig economy provides quick and accessible job opportunities for those in need of immediate income.
Low Entry Barriers: Platforms like Uber, TaskRabbit, and Fiverr offer jobs that often require minimal qualifications or upfront investment.
Short-Term Income: Gig work can provide a temporary solution for those who are unemployed, helping them earn money while searching for permanent positions.
2. Supplemental Income
For many, the gig economy offers a way to supplement their income from traditional employment.
Part-Time Gigs: Individuals can take on gig work outside of their regular jobs to earn additional income, helping them manage economic instability.
Diverse Opportunities: Gig work spans various fields including delivery services, freelance writing, graphic design, and home repairs, allowing workers to find gigs that match their skills.
3. Empowerment of Independent Workers
The gig economy empowers individuals to become their own bosses, promoting entrepreneurship and self-employment.
Control Over Workload: Gig workers can choose the amount of work they take on, which helps in balancing personal and professional lives.
Skill Utilization: It allows individuals to monetize a wide range of skills, from driving and tutoring to creative and technical abilities.
Combined Impact on Unemployment Reduction
1. Dynamic and Resilient Workforce
The synergy between startups and the gig economy contributes to a dynamic and resilient workforce.
Adaptability: Workers can transition between gig work and startup employment, gaining varied experience and reducing long-term unemployment risks.
Economic Resilience: During economic downturns, the flexibility of the gig economy and the innovative nature of startups can provide alternative employment options, mitigating the impact of job losses in traditional sectors.
2. Support for Economic Growth
Both startups and the gig economy play crucial roles in stimulating economic growth.
Increased Productivity: Startups often introduce efficiencies and new technologies that increase overall productivity.
Consumption and Demand: As people gain employment through startups and gig work, their increased purchasing power stimulates demand for goods and services, further driving economic growth.
Conclusion
Startups and the gig economy significantly contribute to reducing unemployment by creating diverse job opportunities, fostering innovation, and providing flexible work arrangements. Their roles in offering immediate employment, supplementing incomes, and empowering independent workers are vital in today’s evolving economic landscape.
Through these mechanisms, they not only address unemployment but also drive broader economic growth and resilience.
