Affordable DoorDash Clone Solution – Low Cost, Fast Launch!

Kickstart your global food delivery business with our ready-made DoorDash Clone App, built for startups & small businesses at a low cost.
🚀 Features include
✅ Real-Time Order Tracking
✅ Secure Local Payments
✅ Easy Admin Panel
✅ Multi-Service Ready.
🔥 Special Offer: Launch at 50% OFF + Free Demo! Don’t wait — start your food delivery app today.
🌐 Free Demo: https://www.trioangle.com/...
📲 WhatsApp: +91 6379630152 | 📩 salestrioangle.com

#fooddeliveryapp #doordashclone #DeliveryApp #RestaurantDeliveryApp #FastFoodDelivery #GroceryDeliveryApp #StartupApp #EntrepreneurApp #OnlineDeliveryApp #MultiServiceDelivery #DeliveryTrackingApp #LowCostApp #AffordableApp #Delivery Business #Delivery Startup

Best Food Delivery Apps – 50% Offer - Entrepreneur Choice

Looking for the best app for restaurant delivery? We build feature-rich food delivery apps, including fast food delivery app and grocery & food delivery app. Grow like UberEats & DoorDash. Free demo available – connect with us today!

Free Demo: https://www.trioangle.com/...
Contact:
salestrioangle.com | +91 6379630152 | Trioangle_Technologies

#FoodDeliveryApps #RestaurantDeliveryApp #FastFoodDeliveryApp #GroceryDeliveryApp #BestDeliveryApp #deliverybusiness #DeliveryAppDevelopment #FoodAppStartup #OnDemandDeliveryApp #FoodBusinessGrowth #ubereatsclone #doordashclone #justeatclone #talabatclone #DeliverooClone

Build Your Food Delivery Empire with Oyelabs’ UberEats Clone

Step up in the growing food delivery market with Oyelabs’ UberEats clone app a white-label solution that lets you manage multiple restaurants, handle real-time order tracking, support secure multi-gateway payments, push notifications and reviews, plus dynamic menus with custom pricing and filters. Everything you need to launch a scalable delivery platform under your own brand.

https://oyelabs.com/uberea...

#ubereatsclone #fooddeliveryapp #DeliveryMarketplace #OnDemandFood #RestaurantManagement #oyelabs #SecurePayments #RealTimeTracking

Deliveroo Clone App Development

https://www.v3cube.com/del...

Launch your Deliveroo clone – a ready-made food and shopping delivery business app solution. Scalable fast, maximize revenue & start delivery business today. Our Deliveroo clone script is available for both iOS & Android devices. It is on-demand food delivery platform designed to replicate the core functionality of popular food delivery services like Deliveroo.

#DeliverooClone , #deliveroocloneapp , #deliverooclonescript , #foodandshoppingdeliveryapp

Launch Your Own Branded Food Delivery Platform with Oyelabs’ UberEats Clone

Enter the competitive food delivery space with a customizable UberEats clone app by Oyelabs. Manage multiple restaurants, enable real-time delivery tracking, integrate secure payment gateways, send instant push notifications, and offer personalized menus with flexible pricing. A complete white-label solution to grow your food delivery business at scale.

https://oyelabs.com/uberea...

#UberEatsCloneApp #FoodDeliverySolution #OnDemandDelivery #RestaurantAppDevelopment #WhiteLabelFoodApp #oyelabs #FoodTech #ScalableDeliveryPlatform

What is an AliExpress Clone? A Guide for Multi-Vendor Business

The eCommerce industry has witnessed immersive growth, fueled by new technology innovations and evolving user demands.
AliExpress Clone is one of the top on-demand platforms with a scalable architecture, unique layouts, and standard vendor management. It opens a new opportunity for startups to stand out in a competitive marketplace.

This blog provides a complete guide to building a multi-vendor app using an AliExpress clone script. We covered its essential features, development steps, and latest trends.
Dive in.

Aliexpress Clone: An Introduction
Don’t you know what an AliExpress clone is? Here’s a short overview of it. Let’s check in.

An AliExpress clone is a ready-made solution inspired by the original AliExpress business model, designed with its core functionalities intact. This connects every single user who wants to order products through an online medium. They can compare prices across multiple vendors and finally buy a product from a preferred store. It increases user convenience and satisfaction.
This eCommerce clone script streamlines the complete end-to-end purchasing process with advanced features, including user registration, multiple delivery addresses, shipment tracking, and secure payments.

Partner With Trioangle and Start Today!
Obviously, you are at the right place to start and implement your multi-vendor marketplace idea.
Trioangle's AliExpress Clone Script can help you turn your idea into a robust and revenue-generating eCommerce platform.

Connect with our experts to acknowledge business goals and craft solutions that meet your target audience's needs.
Subscribe now!

https://www.trioangle.com/...

#AliExpressClone #AliExpressCloneScript #AliExpressLikeApp #MultiVendorEcommerce #MarketplaceSoftware #EcommerceScript #ReadymadeEcommerce #B2BMarketplace #OnlineMarketplace

Build Your Food Delivery Empire with Oyelabs’ UberEats Clone

Step up in the growing food delivery market with Oyelabs’ UberEats clone app — a white-label solution that lets you manage multiple restaurants, handle real-time order tracking, support secure multi-gateway payments, push notifications and reviews, plus dynamic menus with custom pricing and filters. Everything you need to launch a scalable delivery platform under your own brand.

https://oyelabs.com/uberea...

#ubereatsclone #fooddeliveryapp #DeliveryMarketplace #OnDemandFood #RestaurantManagement #oyelabs #SecurePayments #RealTimeTracking

Focus Nigeria-
How can public hospitals be improved to serve the poor better?
Improving public hospitals to better serve the poor requires a comprehensive strategy that addresses the core issues of funding, infrastructure, human resources, efficiency, and patient-centered care.
For a country like Nigeria, where the majority of the population relies on public healthcare and poverty is widespread, these improvements are vital for national development and social equity.

Here's a detailed approach:

I. Increased and Transparent Funding:

Allocate More Budgetary Resources: Governments at federal, state, and local levels must significantly increase the percentage of their budgets allocated to healthcare, aiming to meet or exceed international recommendations (e.g., the Abuja Declaration's 15%).

Targeted Funding for the Poor: Earmark specific funds for initiatives that directly benefit low-income patients, such as subsidized or free essential services, medications, and diagnostic tests for those who cannot afford them.

Strengthen Health Insurance Schemes (e.g., NHIS):

Expand Coverage: Aggressively expand the reach of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) to cover a larger portion of the informal sector and vulnerable populations, potentially through community-based health insurance models or state-led initiatives.

Subsidies for the Poor: Implement government subsidies or premium support for low-income households to ensure they can afford health insurance contributions.

Streamline Processes: Simplify the enrollment and claims processes for the poor to reduce bureaucratic hurdles.

Combat Corruption and Ensure Accountability:

Implement robust financial management systems, regular audits, and strict anti-corruption measures within public hospitals to prevent embezzlement and ensure funds are used for their intended purpose.

Introduce performance-based funding where hospitals receive additional funds based on patient outcomes, efficiency, and satisfaction.

II. Infrastructure and Equipment Upgrade:

Renovation and Modernization: Invest in systematic renovation and modernization of existing public hospital buildings to create clean, safe, and dignified environments.

Equip with Modern Technology: Provide essential, functional diagnostic and treatment equipment (e.g., X-ray machines, ultrasound scanners, laboratory equipment, essential surgical tools). Ensure maintenance contracts and availability of spare parts.

Reliable Utilities: Guarantee constant access to clean water, reliable electricity (invest in solar power as a sustainable backup), and proper waste management systems in all public hospitals.

Basic Amenities: Ensure availability of basic amenities like clean restrooms (separate for male/female), comfortable waiting areas, and proper ventilation.

III. Human Resources Development and Motivation:

Adequate Staffing: Recruit and retain a sufficient number of qualified doctors, nurses, pharmacists, laboratory scientists, and other support staff to reduce workload and improve patient-to-staff ratios.

Competitive Remuneration and Welfare: Offer attractive and timely salaries, allowances, and a comprehensive benefits package (including health insurance and pensions) to stem the brain drain and motivate staff.

Continuous Professional Development (CPD): Provide regular training opportunities to upgrade skills, keep staff abreast of new medical advancements, and improve patient communication.

Ethical Conduct and Empathy Training: Conduct mandatory training on medical ethics, patient rights, empathy, and respectful communication, particularly towards low-income patients who may feel disempowered.

Performance Incentives: Introduce performance-based incentives for staff tied to patient satisfaction, quality of care, and efficiency, rather than just volume.

Safety and Security: Enhance security measures within hospital premises to protect staff from harassment or violence.

IV. Operational Efficiency and Patient-Centered Care:

Streamline Processes: Implement efficient patient flow systems, from registration to consultation, diagnosis, and treatment, to reduce long waiting times and bureaucratic bottlenecks.

Digitalization (Electronic Health Records - EHR):

Implement EHR systems to improve record-keeping, reduce errors, enhance data sharing among departments, and enable better patient tracking.

Digitalize appointment scheduling and billing to minimize human interface and reduce opportunities for corruption.

Focus on Primary Healthcare (PHC): Strengthen the referral system from PHC centers to secondary and tertiary public hospitals. Well-equipped and staffed PHCs can manage common ailments, reducing the burden on hospitals and making basic care accessible at the community level.

Culturally Sensitive Care: Train staff to understand and respect the cultural beliefs and practices of diverse patient populations, which can influence health-seeking behaviors.

Patient Feedback Mechanisms: Establish accessible and confidential channels for patients to provide feedback, lodge complaints, and make suggestions for improvement. Use this feedback to drive continuous improvement.

Transparency and Information: Clearly display service costs (if any), patients' rights, and grievance procedures. Provide clear information about treatment plans in a language patients understand.

V. Innovative Service Delivery Models:

Mobile Clinics and Outreach Programs: Implement mobile health clinics that travel to underserved rural communities, providing basic diagnostic, preventive, and primary care services, as well as health education.

Telemedicine: Leverage telemedicine for remote consultations, specialist opinions, and follow-ups, particularly for patients in remote areas where specialists are scarce. This can reduce travel costs and time for patients.

Community Health Workers (CHWs): Train and deploy CHWs from within the communities to act as a link between the community and the health system, providing basic health education, screening, and facilitating referrals.

Partnerships with NGOs and CSOs: Collaborate with non-governmental organizations and civil society organizations that have experience in delivering healthcare to underserved populations.

By implementing these strategies, public hospitals can move towards becoming trusted, accessible, and high-quality healthcare providers for all, especially the most vulnerable members of society.

Is the World and mainstream media Rewarding Hamas for Its Atrocities and condemning Israel for defending itself? (Part2)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
HAMAS SURRENDER NOW- WAR GOES ON UNTIL HAMAS SURRENDER.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The call for Hamas's surrender is not a universally adopted issue for a number of complex and interconnected reasons, which are rooted in political, historical, and ideological factors.

1. Hamas's Ideology and Strategic Goals:
Rejection of Surrender: Hamas, as an organization, fundamentally rejects the idea of surrender. Its charter and core ideology are based on armed resistance against Israel. Surrendering would be seen as a betrayal of its principles and a complete defeat of the Palestinian cause, as the group defines it. From their perspective, their actions are part of a broader "liberation" struggle.

Hostages as Leverage: Hamas uses the hostages as its most powerful bargaining chip. A unilateral surrender would mean giving up this leverage without securing any of its demands, such as a permanent ceasefire, the release of Palestinian prisoners, or the end of the Israeli blockade of Gaza.

2. Diverse International and Regional Perspectives:
Political Alignments: The international community is not a unified entity. Many countries and political groups have different relationships with Israel and the Palestinians. Some, particularly in the Global South and the Middle East, may view Hamas as a legitimate resistance movement against Israeli occupation, rather than solely as a terrorist organization. For these groups, a call for surrender would be seen as siding with Israel and ignoring the Palestinian struggle.

Focus on the Humanitarian Crisis: Many international bodies and humanitarian organizations prioritize the immediate cessation of violence and the delivery of aid to the civilian population in Gaza. They believe that a call for a ceasefire is a more achievable and humane goal than demanding a surrender, which could prolong the conflict and lead to more civilian deaths. Their focus is on alleviating suffering, not on a specific military or political outcome.

Distrust of Israeli Intentions: Some critics of Israel believe that a Hamas surrender would not lead to a lasting peace or a political solution for the Palestinians. They argue that Israel would simply consolidate its control over the region and that a post-Hamas Gaza would not be a viable, self-governing entity. They point to the long history of occupation and conflict as evidence that Israel is not genuinely interested in a two-state solution.

3. The Role of the Palestinian Population:
Hamas's Popularity: While many Palestinians do not support Hamas, the group's popularity has at times been linked to its role in providing social services and its perceived resistance to Israeli policies. For some Palestinians, a call for Hamas's surrender is viewed as a call to accept a status quo of Israeli control, which they oppose.

Lack of a Viable Alternative: There is no universally recognized or powerful alternative to Hamas to govern Gaza. The Palestinian Authority, which governs parts of the West Bank, is widely seen as weak and ineffective by many Palestinians. As a result, a call for Hamas's surrender without a clear and legitimate plan for a post-Hamas Gaza is seen as creating a power vacuum that could lead to even greater instability.

4. The Practical and Strategic Unlikelihood of Surrender:
Military Futility: From a purely practical standpoint, many observers believe that a call for Hamas's surrender is a futile gesture. Hamas is a decentralized and ideologically driven organization. Even if its top leaders were killed or captured, the group's ideology and capacity for resistance could persist, as has been the case with other armed groups in the past.

The "Forever War" Narrative: Some analysts argue that a call for Hamas's total elimination by force is a strategy that leads to a "forever war" and that a political solution, even if imperfect, is the only way to achieve a lasting peace. They believe that military action alone cannot solve a deeply rooted political and ideological conflict.

In essence, while the desire to see an end to violence is widespread, the specific demand for Hamas's unconditional surrender is not universally adopted because it is seen by different groups as either unrealistic, politically biased, counterproductive to humanitarian goals, or a failure to address the underlying causes of the conflict.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Is the World and mainstream media Rewarding Hamas for Its Atrocities and condemning Israel for defending itself? (Part1)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
HAMAS SURRENDER NOW- WAR GOES ON UNTIL HAMAS SURRENDER.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The claim that the world and mainstream media are "rewarding Hamas" and "condemning Israel for defending itself" is a highly contentious issue with various perspectives. An analysis of global media coverage and international responses reveals a complex landscape.

Regarding media coverage:
Accusations of Bias: There are widespread and often opposing accusations of bias in media coverage of the conflict. Some critics argue that Western mainstream media often downplays Palestinian suffering and disproportionately focuses on Israeli narratives, while others contend that the media is overly critical of Israel and presents a one-sided view that favors the Palestinian cause.

Differing Terminology: The language used by media outlets is a frequent point of contention. Some outlets have been criticized for using more emotive language like "massacre" or "slaughter" when describing Israeli casualties, but not when reporting on Palestinian deaths.

Access and Censorship: Israel has been criticized for imposing restrictions on international journalists' access to Gaza, leading many news organizations to rely on local Palestinian journalists and freelancers. This has raised concerns about the ability of the media to provide a complete and unfiltered picture of events.

Focus on Humanitarian Crisis: A significant portion of recent media coverage has focused on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, including reports of starvation and the high number of civilian casualties. This has led to international condemnation of Israel's military actions and calls for a ceasefire.

Regarding international responses:
Initial Condemnation of Hamas: Following the initial attacks by Hamas, many countries, particularly Western nations, strongly condemned the actions of Hamas, expressed solidarity with Israel, and affirmed Israel's right to self-defense.

Growing Criticism of Israel: As the conflict has progressed, a growing number of countries and international bodies have become increasingly critical of Israel's military campaign. This criticism is often linked to the high number of Palestinian casualties, the humanitarian situation, and Israeli military plans for Gaza.

Calls for a Ceasefire: The United Nations and many countries have repeatedly called for a ceasefire or a humanitarian pause. These calls are often driven by concerns about civilian lives and the unfolding humanitarian crisis.

Lack of a Unified "International Community": It's important to note that there isn't a single "international community" with a unified voice. Responses to the conflict vary widely, with different countries and organizations taking diverse positions based on their political alignments, historical ties, and domestic public opinion.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The question of why various groups are not calling for Hamas to surrender and release all hostages, dead or alive, is complex and has multiple facets. While many countries and international bodies have indeed made such calls, there are several reasons why this is not a universally adopted or consistently emphasized position.

1. The "All or Nothing" Stance of the Parties Involved:
Hamas's Position: Hamas has consistently stated that a full release of hostages is contingent on a permanent ceasefire, the complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza, and the release of a large number of Palestinian prisoners. For Hamas, the hostages are a primary bargaining chip to achieve its political and military objectives. From its perspective, surrendering and releasing hostages without these concessions would be a complete loss and negate its strategic advantage.

Israel's Position: Israel's stated war aims have been the destruction of Hamas's military and governing capabilities and the return of all hostages. However, some critics argue that Israel's actions, such as rejecting certain ceasefire proposals and expanding military operations, have not always prioritized the return of hostages, suggesting that other goals like territorial control or the "dismantling" of Hamas are also major drivers. The Israeli government has been criticized for not accepting deals that would secure hostage release in exchange for ending military operations, with some claiming that this demonstrates that the return of hostages is not its central priority.

2. The Role of Ceasefire Negotiations:
Mediated Diplomacy: The focus of many international actors, including the United States, Qatar, and Egypt, has been on brokering a ceasefire deal that includes a phased release of hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners and a temporary pause in fighting. This approach is seen as a more realistic path to securing the hostages' release than demanding an unconditional surrender, which Hamas has repeatedly rejected. The goal is to create a pathway for de-escalation and humanitarian aid, not to achieve a total military victory for one side.

Hamas's Perceived Leverage: For many international observers, a call for an unconditional surrender is seen as an unrealistic demand that would likely be ignored by Hamas. This is because the group views the hostages as its most valuable asset in the negotiation process. Many believe that such a call would not only be ineffective but could also prolong the conflict and endanger the lives of the remaining hostages.

3. Political and Public Opinion Dynamics:
Diverse Views on the Conflict: The international community is not a monolith. Different countries have different relationships with Israel and the Palestinians, and their domestic political landscapes shape their official positions. Many countries that are critical of Israel's military actions are more inclined to call for an immediate and permanent ceasefire, which they believe is the only way to alleviate the humanitarian crisis, rather than focusing solely on a call for Hamas's surrender.

Differing Objectives: While many people around the world want to see the hostages released, many also believe that the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the long-term conflict are the more pressing issues. As a result, their calls for action are focused on a cessation of hostilities and the delivery of aid, rather than a demand for Hamas's surrender. Some observers believe that Hamas's actions, while condemned, have strategically brought the Palestinian cause back to the forefront of global conversation, which for some is a more significant development than the group's surrender.

In short, while calls for Hamas to release the hostages are indeed made by many, the absence of a universal call for unconditional surrender is a reflection of the complex realities on the ground, the perceived futility of such a demand, the strategic priorities of the key actors, and the diverse perspectives within the international community regarding the conflict.

Data, Dollars, and Drones: Who Controls Tomorrow’s Tools?
“He who controls the data, programs the future. He who owns the drones, defends—or dictates—it. And he who prints the dollars, plays God with the global economy.”

The 21st century won’t be ruled by empires of land—it will be ruled by empires of data, capital, and surveillance technology. In this new world, algorithms shape minds, money moves faster than people, and drones fly where diplomacy dares not go.

But who truly owns these tools? Who benefits? And who is being left behind—or watched from above?

Data: The New Oil or the New Chains?
4.6 billion people are now online—most on mobile phones

Africa contributes a massive stream of digital behavior—but stores little of it locally

American and Chinese tech giants own 90% of global data traffic and storage

While data is harvested from Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia, it’s analyzed in Silicon Valley, processed in Shenzhen, and monetized without consent.

“We are not just users—we are the unpaid labor feeding AI.”

Even worse: data colonialism is rising—where nations are reduced to mere sources of behavioral raw material.

Dollars: Still King of a Decaying Kingdom
Despite talk of "de-dollarization":

The US dollar dominates 88% of global trade

Countries like Ghana, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka still face currency collapse based on Fed decisions

Dollar scarcity creates austerity, debt dependency, and policy handcuffs for many Global South nations

The IMF and World Bank, still largely Western-controlled, act as gatekeepers to emergency funds—often in exchange for structural reforms that weaken local industries and sovereignty.

“When Washington sneezes, African currencies catch pneumonia.”

Meanwhile, crypto and fintechs try to provide escape routes—but they face crackdowns or co-option.

Drones: From Warfare to Watchdogs
Once a futuristic fantasy, drones are now:

Weapons in proxy wars (Libya, Ethiopia, Ukraine)

Surveillance tools for regimes monitoring protests

Delivery agents for aid and vaccines in hard-to-reach zones

Business tools for agriculture and logistics

But who owns the skies?

China’s DJI controls over 70% of the global commercial drone market

US and Israeli military drones dominate combat zones

African countries import rather than manufacture—despite strong use cases

Drones may save lives—or spy on them. Liberate farmers—or be used to suppress dissent.

Who’s Really in Control?
Let’s break it down:

Tool Controlled By Impact on Global South
Data Big Tech (US, China) Extracted, not owned
Dollars US Federal Reserve Externalized pain
Drones China, US, Israel Imported, rarely made

In all three, the Global South is a consumer, not a controller. And Africa, in particular, risks becoming the testing ground, resource mine, and data farm for tomorrow’s tech empires.

The Risks of Dependency
Surveillance authoritarianism (via foreign-built tech)

Digital dictatorships (where information flow is centralized)

Economic instability (due to external financial control)

Policy blackmail (based on foreign data or financial leverage)

If tomorrow’s tools are not domestically owned or ethically governed, Africa and other regions may end up technologically colonized—even as they go digital.

What Can Be Done?
-Data Sovereignty
-Build local data centers
-Enact data protection laws
Push for digital commons and open-source alternatives

Financial Autonomy
Explore pan-African payment systems and stable coins

Create sovereign wealth tech funds

Reduce dependency on external aid tied to conditionalities

Drone & Tech Manufacturing
Invest in STEM education and hardware innovation

Support tech hubs and partnerships with ethical manufacturers

Use drones for development, not just surveillance

Conclusion: Tools Are Not Neutral
Data, dollars, and drones will define this century. But they are not just neutral instruments—they are extensions of power, control, and ideology.

Africa and the rest of the Global South must ask:

Will we own the tools of tomorrow—or be owned by them?

This is not just a tech question.
It’s a question of sovereignty, freedom, and the shape of the future.

How can Nigeria make quality education more accessible in rural areas?
Making quality education more accessible in rural areas of Nigeria is a complex undertaking that requires a holistic and sustained approach, addressing issues across infrastructure, human resources, technology, community engagement, and funding.

Here's how it can be achieved:

I. Infrastructure and Facilities Development:

Context-Specific School Construction and Renovation:

Durable & Local Materials: Build and renovate school buildings using durable, locally sourced, and climate-appropriate materials. Designs should consider natural lighting and ventilation.

Essential Amenities: Ensure all schools have basic facilities: clean and functional toilets (separate for boys and girls), access to clean water, reliable electricity (solar power is a viable option), and proper ventilation.

Flexible Learning Spaces: Create adaptable classrooms that can accommodate different learning styles and potentially multi-grade teaching, which is common in smaller rural schools.

Libraries and Labs: Equip schools with functional libraries and basic science/computer laboratories. These can be shared resources among clusters of schools.

Mobile and Satellite Learning Centers:

For extremely remote or sparsely populated areas, explore mobile classrooms or "learning hubs" that rotate among communities, or satellite learning centers that provide access to digital resources and connectivity.

II. Qualified and Motivated Teachers:

Incentives for Rural Deployment:

Improved Remuneration: Offer attractive salary packages, allowances, and hardship pay for teachers willing to serve in rural areas.

Housing and Utilities: Provide subsidized or free housing, access to reliable electricity, and potable water to make rural living more appealing.

Career Advancement Opportunities: Create clear pathways for career progression for rural teachers, linked to performance and continuous professional development.

Loan Forgiveness/Scholarships: Offer student loan forgiveness or scholarships to aspiring teachers who commit to serving in rural schools for a specified period.

Targeted Recruitment and Training:

Local Recruitment: Prioritize recruiting teachers from within or near rural communities, as they are often more likely to stay due to existing ties.

Specialized Training: Equip teachers with skills for multi-grade teaching, differentiated instruction, and managing large classes. Training should also cover culturally sensitive pedagogy and community engagement.

Continuous Professional Development (CPD): Implement regular, accessible, and relevant CPD programs, utilizing blended learning models (online modules, local workshops) to reduce travel burdens.

Mentorship Programs: Pair experienced urban teachers with rural counterparts for mentorship and support.

III. Leveraging Technology (Bridging the Digital Divide):

Sustainable Power and Connectivity:

Solar Power: Prioritize equipping rural schools with reliable solar power systems to run computers, projectors, and charging stations.

Affordable Internet: Work with telecom providers and government agencies (e.g., NCC, NITDA) to extend affordable, reliable internet connectivity to rural areas, perhaps through community Wi-Fi hotspots or satellite internet.

Digital Learning Resources:

Tablets/E-readers: Provide students and teachers with rugged, low-cost tablets preloaded with digital textbooks, educational apps, and interactive learning content (e.g., "Solar-Powered Tablets").

Learning Management Systems (LMS): Implement simple LMS platforms that can deliver content offline and sync when connectivity is available.

Educational TV/Radio: Utilize existing media (radio, TV) to deliver curriculum-aligned lessons, especially in areas with limited internet access.

Teacher Digital Literacy Training:
Train teachers not just on how to use technology, but how to integrate it effectively into their pedagogy to enhance learning outcomes.

IV. Community Engagement and Ownership:

School-Based Management Committees (SBMCs):
Strengthen and empower SBMCs with genuine decision-making authority and training in financial management, school development planning, and monitoring.

Encourage active participation of parents, traditional leaders, and community members in school governance, resource mobilization, and monitoring teacher attendance and performance.

Community Contributions:
Foster a sense of community ownership by encouraging local contributions (labor, materials, financial support) for school development projects.

Integrate schools into community life, making them centers for community development, adult literacy programs, and health awareness.

Sensitization and Advocacy:
Conduct targeted campaigns to raise awareness among rural parents about the value of education, especially for girls, and discourage child labor or early marriage.

V. Funding and Policy:

Increased and Targeted Funding:

Higher Education Allocation: Significantly increase the overall budget allocation to education, ensuring a substantial portion is dedicated to rural school development and teacher welfare.

Specific Rural Education Fund: Establish a dedicated fund for rural education, managed transparently, to address unique challenges.

Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs): Encourage and incentivize private sector involvement through CSR initiatives, grants, and direct investment in rural schools.

Innovative Financing: Explore mechanisms like education bonds, diaspora engagement, and philanthropic partnerships to supplement government funding.

Flexible and Context-Specific Policies:

Local Curriculum Adaptation: Allow for some flexibility in curriculum delivery to address local contexts, needs, and cultural nuances, while maintaining national standards.

Remote Learning Policies: Develop clear policies for remote and blended learning that can be effectively deployed during emergencies or to support continuous learning.

Data-Driven Planning: Establish robust data collection and analysis systems to identify out-of-school children, monitor learning outcomes in rural areas, and allocate resources effectively based on needs.

Making quality education accessible in rural Nigeria requires sustained political will, a commitment to transparent resource utilization, and genuine collaboration among all stakeholders to overcome the geographical, economic, and social barriers.

After Combat Debut Of JAS-39 Gripens, Thailand To Add More SAAB Fighter Jets To Boost Its Air Force.
Thailand has finally approved the acquisition of four SAAB Gripen-E/F fighter jets as it modernizes its aging air force amid rising security threats, as seen in the recent border conflict with Cambodia.

What began as skirmishes between the two countries in July 2025 quickly escalated into full-scale firefights, with artillery and gunfire rattling border villages for nearly a week. The conflict lasted for about five days before the two warring sides decided to accept an “immediate and unconditional ceasefire” on July 28.

The Royal Thai Air Force (RTAF) currently operates the Gripen-C/D and the older American F-16 Fighting Falcons. Both aircraft were deployed in combat and used to launch strikes on Cambodian artillery positions.

This marked the combat debut for the Gripens anywhere in the world, 37 years after their first flight.

The conflict, rooted in a century-long border dispute, has raised concerns about further escalation. However, the purchase of Gripen-E/F was decided well in advance of this latest conflict and is not directly influenced by the hostilities with Cambodia.

The Royal Thai Air Force (RTAF) officially announced its decision to buy a dozen Saab Gripen-E fighter jets over the American Lockheed Martin F-16 Block 70/72 aircraft in June. The Gripen-E outperformed the American F-16 Block 70/72 by offering technological and financial advantages that made its offer far more appealing and beneficial to Thailand.

The deal is a part of a long-term plan to acquire all 12 Gripen E/F aircraft by 2035 and integrate them operationally. The newly purchased Gripen-E variant will replace the archaic F-16 A/B and will be integrated into the RTAF alongside the existing SAAB Gripen jets.

Saab describes Gripen-E as “Designed to defeat any adversary. Made for forward-thinking air forces, Gripen E incorporates cutting-edge technologies, the latest systems, sensors, weapons, and pods to ensure combat advantage, delivering air superiority in highly contested environments. Silent networking and total sensor fusion across a tactical air unit to blind and confuse the enemy. One aircraft is active, the others go passive.”

The Swedish manufacturer promises that the aircraft allows the first missile launch opportunity and the first kill. Saab claims its design represents a breakthrough, allowing it to swiftly integrate new hardware and update software applications to adapt to evolving mission requirements. Further, the fighter jet incorporates more prominent air intakes and is powered by the enhanced General Electric F414-GE-39E engine.

It is designed for quick field deployment, especially at remote bases, and can be effectively maintained by a few people.

While Thailand was impressed by the cutting-edge features of the Gripen, it was the large scope of the Swedish deal, particularly the technology transfer, that mainly bore fruit. Lockheed Martin, the manufacturer of the F-16, was a lot more conservative in offering a deal to Thailand, as previously explained in detail by the EurAsian Times.

With a fighter fleet including upgraded F-16s, F-5s, and Gripens, Thailand has been steadily modernising its capabilities with multi-role platforms. That dominance became apparent during the border clashes. Cambodia, with no dedicated fighter jets in its inventory, had little ability to deter or respond to Thailand’s precision air strikes.

This may come as an added impetus to the acquisition.

However, Thailand is not the only country in the Southeast Asian region to go on fighter jet shopping in recent times. Several others, including Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Vietnam, are exploring options and looking to sign new deals.

New And Advanced Fighter Jets In SEA
In addition to Thailand, Indonesia has been in the headlines for its intention to acquire new and more advanced combat aircraft.

The Indonesian government recently signed a contract to acquire 48 KAAN fighter jets from Turkey. The agreement covers extensive collaboration in manufacturing, technology transfer, engineering, and includes the establishment of a local aerospace infrastructure.

Indonesia is also co-developing the KF-21 4.5th generation aircraft, along with South Korea, and has a deal for 42 Rafale fighter jets with French Dassault Aviation. It could acquire an additional batch of Rafales from France, as indicated by the letter of intent (LoI) signed by the government recently.

Another Southeast Asian country, Malaysia, is building up its air power amid rising security threats in the South China Sea. On June 17, Royal Malaysian Air Force (RMAF) Chief General Tan Sri Asghar Khan Goriman Khan confirmed that Washington had approved the third-party transfer of up to 33 F/A-18C/D Hornets currently in service with the Kuwaiti Air Force (KAF). In addition to this, the RMAF is also acquiring the South Korean FA-50.

Malaysia launched the MRCA (Multi-Role Combat Aircraft) program to acquire advanced fighter jets that could replace its aging fleet and help enhance Malaysia’s air power with a modern, multi-role fighter jet. This program has remained in limbo for several years. Some unconfirmed reports earlier suggested that Malaysia was interested in Russia’s Su-57 but those rumours have now fizzled out.

The most significant fighter jet acquisition in the region is the purchase of the US F-16 by the Philippines. The United States approved the sale of F-16 fighter jets worth US$5.58 billion to the Philippines in April as Manila builds capability to deter an increasingly aggressive China in the South China Sea. The Philippines Air Force (PAF), like its Thai counterpart, had earlier been examining two combat aircraft on offer, the Lockheed Martin F-16 Block 70/72 and the Saab Gripen-E.

The upgrade of the PAF would be essential for enhancing the Philippines’ ability to project power beyond its territorial waters. In addition to a new multi-role fighter, the country is also considering purchasing a dozen additional FA-50 fighters from South Korea to increase its numbers and boost readiness.

Meanwhile, Vietnam has reportedly been discussing a potential purchase of two dozen F-16s from the United States, in what is being interpreted as a break in the country’s strategic alignment with Russia.

The move is aimed at deterring China, which claims almost the entire South China Sea, has several territorial disputes in the region, and has been steadily expanding its military influence in the region.

Though unconfirmed, the reports suggest that Vietnam has been on the lookout for an alternative to its retired MiG-21, the Soviet-designed supersonic jet fighter and interceptor aircraft. There is no information on which F-16 is being negotiated and whether it would be a new aircraft or a used one.

The war-torn country of Myanmar has also made a significant acquisition. In January 2025, the Myanmar Air Force took delivery of its six Su-30 SMEs from Russia.

The six Russian jets were acquired under a 2018 contract valued at US$400 million. The acquisition has been financed through a Russian loan, and the final two fighter jets were commissioned on December 15, 2024, at Meiktila Air Base in Mandalay.

These Su-30 jets will serve as Myanmar’s primary aircraft for safeguarding territorial integrity and countering terror threats, and are stationed at Naypyidaw Air Base, enabling coverage of the entire country.

The Myanmar Junta is strengthening its air capabilities to deal with the rebels. On December 15 alone, the military commissioned six Russian-made Mi-17 helicopters, six Chinese-made FTC-2000G fighter jets, one K-8W fighter jet, and one Y-8 support aircraft, as earlier reported by the EurAsian Times.

Though attention has largely been focused on the turbulence and military build-up in Asia, the above-listed acquisitions suggest that Southeast Asia is evolving and going through a catharsis of its own as new security threats emerge and existing threats become bigger and more pronounced

Ahead Of Trump-Putin Talks, Russia Readies World’s 1st Nuclear-Powered Cruise Missile — 9M730 Burevestnik: Reports

As Russian President Vladimir Putin heads to Alaska for a rare face-to-face meeting with his US counterpart, President Donald Trump, for Ukraine peace talks, Moscow is busy preparing another surprise for the world.

According to multiple media reports, Russia is preparing for new tests of its much-discussed and feared 9M730 Burevestnik nuclear-powered cruise missile, a “one-of-a-kind” weapon in Moscow’s arsenal.

If these tests are successful, Russia will become the first country in history to have an operational cruise missile capable of carrying a nuclear warhead that moves on a nuclear propulsion system, giving it an unlimited range that can hit any other point on the planet from any point.

“Russia appears to be on the verge of conducting a new test of its controversial nuclear-powered cruise missile, the 9M730 Burevestnik (NATO code: SSC-X-9 Skyfall), from the Pankovo range in the Arctic archipelago of Novaya Zemlya,” Defense Romania reported.

While Moscow has not made any official announcement, multiple clues point in this direction. Firstly, a NOTAM (Notice to Airmen) warning has been issued from August 7 to August 12, covering 40,000 square kilometers over Novaya Zemlya.

Secondly, at least four russian vessels, previously anchored near the Pankovo test site, have moved into observation positions in the eastern Barents Sea, a standard safety measure taken during large missile trials.

Besides, two Rosatom aircraft are currently based at Rogachevo air base. Furthermore, in recent weeks, cargo ships have made multiple stops at Novaya Zemlya, suggesting logistical operations.

“Preparations have been underway for weeks at the Pankovo launch site on Novaya Zemlya in the Russian Arctic,” Norway’s ‘The Barents Observer‘ reported.

Notably, the Novaya Zemlya archipelago has been Rosatom’s chosen site for testing nuclear weapons and related technology since the late 1950s.

The 9M730 Burevestnik: World’s First Nuclear-Powered Missile
The Burevestnik represents a revolutionary weapon, and its specificity lies in the combination of nuclear energy propulsion and the ability to carry nuclear warheads, which gives it an almost unlimited range and the ability to avoid advanced anti-missile defense systems.

President Putin has described this missile as an “invincible” weapon, as its nuclear propulsion allows it to fly with an almost unlimited range. This means that the ‘Burevestnik’ can fly for a long time, changing its direction and trajectory to bypass the opponent’s defense systems, which makes it extremely difficult to intercept.

According to the United States Air Force’s National Air and Space Intelligence Center (NASIC) report, if Burevestnik were to enter service, it would give Russia a “unique weapon with intercontinental-range capability.”

“The aim with the ground-launched Burevestnik, however, is to give the missile alone intercontinental range… between 10,000–20,000km. This would allow the missile to be based anywhere in Russia and still be able to reach targets in the continental US,” the Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) said in its research paper.

Furthermore, a Russian military paper noted that the missile would maintain a notional altitude of 50–100 metres throughout almost all of its flight. While Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs) fly in space along fixed and predictable trajectories, making them easy to intercept, cruise missiles fly at low altitudes and frequently change their path, which makes them difficult to intercept.

The theoretical attraction of nuclear propulsion for a cruise-missile application is that it offers a long-endurance power source far in excess of the traditional turbojet or turbofan engine. For missiles based on turbojet or turbofan engine propulsion systems, the range is in effect a function of how much fuel can be carried on them.

Information about its technology is top secret, but the missile is believed to use a conventional engine for launch, after which it activates a small nuclear reactor. This reactor superheats the incoming air, generating sustained propulsion and giving it a theoretically “unlimited” intercontinental range.

By comparison, Russia’s longest-range liquid-fuelled cruise missile, the Kh-102 (RS-AS-23 Kodiak), has a claimed maximum range of 4,500 kilometres.

However, there remain considerable technical challenges in ensuring the reliable performance of the nuclear-propulsion unit, and there have been multiple failed tests in the past.

Multiple Failed Tests And An Accident
According to the Centre for Strategic and International Studies’ Missile Defense Project, Russia has already conducted over a dozen tests of Burevestnik, with only a few of them achieving partial success.

The first test of the missile was reportedly performed in 2016. However, analysts believe that Russia must have started working on the concept in the early 2000s.

The concept of a nuclear propulsion system is not itself new. In the 1960s, the US experimented with its own design of a nuclear-powered delivery system, but this line of experimentation was abandoned before the actual missile design was ever tested.

The risks associated with this program are significant, as demonstrated by the Nenoksa accident in August 2019. At that time, an explosion during an operation to recover a nuclear propulsion source from the seabed killed several Russian scientists. It also caused a temporary increase in radiation levels in the city of Severodvinsk, underlining the significant risks and technical difficulties associated with a nuclear propulsion system.

On August 8, 2019, the Russian Defense Ministry put out a statement saying that that day, a liquid-propellant rocket engine blast had caused the death of two scientists and had
injured six, but there was no radiation released.

Two days later, Rosatom, Russia’s nuclear agency, issued its first statement on the accident, stating that five Rosatom scientists had died during work on an “isotope power source in a liquid-propulsion system.”

The death toll would rise to seven, and the Kremlin would attribute the accident to a
“nuclear-propelled missile.” Rosatom would go on to say that the test was conducted from
a sea platform and to say that it involved a “nuclear battery.”

“The testing carries a risk of accidents and local radioactive emissions,” Norway’s Intelligence Service (NIS) warned in its threat assessment report published last year. The NIS said that testing of both missiles and torpedoes is expected to continue.

There were further tests conducted in 2021, 2022, and 2023.

Burevestnik’s development, along with that of the Poseidon nuclear torpedo, is part of a broader effort by Russia to diversify and modernize its nuclear triad, giving Moscow assured second-strike capabilities.

However, critics warn that the missile’s large size, over 12 meters, subsonic speed, and emission of radioactive material from its exhaust mean it could be detectable and vulnerable to some types of point and short-range missile defences. Subsonic Russian land-attack cruise missiles have, for instance, been reportedly intercepted in the Ukraine War.

U.S. Fights Su-57 Fighter Threat With F-16’s New Paint Scheme; Is USAF Acknowledging The Might Of Felons?

A Top Aces’ F-16A fighter jet has been spotted in an eye-catching new adversary paint scheme. The fighter aircraft, formerly with the Israeli Air Force, was seen supporting a Russian Su-57 Felon-inspired paint scheme.

Dubbed the “Felon Paint Job,” the aircraft was spotted in Arizona. It flew from Mesa Gateway Airport, where Top Aces performs maintenance on its F-16s, to Luke AFB, Arizona, as ACES 51.

After reaching Luke AFB, Arizona, the fighter jet took part in a local mission under the callsign ACES 1.

Though the fighter jet, formerly known as Netz 284, was also photographed while being wheeled out of the paint barn at Mesa, its return to Luke AFB, Arizona, offered a better look.

The F-16, tail number N871TA and bort number “284” Red, features a low-visibility, splinter-style grey camouflage pattern similar to that used by Russia’s fifth-generation stealth fighter.

The two-tone scheme includes angular transitions across the airframe, mimicking the faceted radar-evading design philosophy of the T-50/Su-57, the Aviationist reported.
The “Felon Paint Job” was complete with Soviet-style red stars on its tail and wings. The tail fin also carried Cyrillic script that read “Опыт Важен” (which translates to “Experience Matters”).

Notably, despite the “Felon Paint Job,” the fighter jet still retains the kill marking it earned in September 1981, when Netz 284 shot down a Syrian MiG-23.

Last year, another F-16 fighter jet from the Top Aces fleet was spotted sporting a “Flanker Blue” color scheme, inspired by the one used by some F-16s of the U.S. Air Force’s 64th Aggressor Squadron at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada.

It remains to be seen what other paint schemes the Top Aces F-16 fleet will support in the coming days.

F-16’s Journey: From Israeli Air Force To Top Aces
The F-16A Netz 284 was one of the fighter jets that were retired from the Israeli Air Force at the end of 2016 and delivered to the US in 2021.

The aircraft was part of the 29 F-16 Netz (Hawk) fighter jets, which retired from the Israeli Air Force in 2016 after 36 years in service, and were subsequently bought by Top Aces for adversary training.

In 2021, the Israeli Ministry of Defense acknowledged the unprecedented sale of 29 F-16 Netz (Hawk) aircraft to Top Aces.

“Following negotiations led by SIBAT, the MoD has signed an unprecedented agreement to supply 29 F-16 aircraft to TOP ACES. These will be employed as staged adversary aircraft in U.S. Air Force training,” the Israeli Ministry of Defense posted on social media site X in 2021.
The first four of these F-16s were received at Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport in February 2021.

The four F-16s, with their wings, tail, and tailerons removed, were loaded on a Ukrainian Antonov An-124 at Tel Aviv-Ben Gurion airport on January 27 and, after a stop in Keflavik, Iceland, they arrived a day later at Phoenix-Mesa Gateway airport.

With these F-16s, Top Aces became the first company to provide a 4th-generation aircraft for staged adversary aircraft training. Till today, these F-16s remain the world’s only privately owned F-16s.

The F-16s were subsequently upgraded to a standard that is known as F-16 AAF (Advanced Aggressor Fighter).

These upgrades included the proprietary Advanced Aggressor Mission System (AAMS), which allows the F-16s to accurately replicate near-peer adversary fighters, enhancing training realism for U.S. pilots, AESA radars, infrared search and track (IRST), helmet-mounted cueing systems, datalinks, and electronic countermeasures to replicate near-peer threats.

The Top Aces’ F-16 fleet has also been equipped with IRST pods.

The “Felon Paint Job” for the F-16 suggests that in the coming days, the US Air Force pilots want to train against the threat posed by advanced fifth-generation Russian aircraft, the Su-57 Felon.

The Su-57 Felon Threat
After struggling with slow deliveries, it seems that Russia is finally making progress with expanding Su-57 production lines.

While the Komsomolsk-on-Amur Aviation Plant is the primary production facility, new facilities have been opened to support this.

Officials have put into operation new development facilities related to the fuel system and started construction of a hangar for avionics testing at the Komsomolsk-on-Amur factory in eastern Russia, the state-owned aerospace conglomerate United Aircraft Corporation announced in August last year.

Russia only has a small number of Su-57 aircraft and they have played a limited role in the war in Ukraine, confined mainly to long-range strikes from within Russian territory.

The contract for the production of 76 planes by the end of 2027 was signed by the Defense Ministry at the Army Forum in June 2019, with Komsomolsk-on-Amur specified as the leading production site.

However, the plant was quickly deemed too small, forcing officials to spend time expanding production space, which entailed changing and adding new equipment.

The Su-57, designed to compete with NATO’s fifth-generation fighters, such as the US F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lightning II, boasts cutting-edge stealth technology, supermaneuverability, and advanced avionics. The VKS received three batches of aircraft over the last year, with the last delivery recorded in December 2024.

Furthermore, in February this year, Yuri Kondratyev, Director of the Komsomolsk-on-Amur Aircraft Production Association (KnAAPO), said that a new version of the aircraft will be delivered to the VKS in 2025.

He did not specify any particular improvements, although there is speculation that the new version might feature the more advanced AL-51F1 or product 30 engines, which could improve the fighter’s performance.

Russian aerospace engineers are also continuously improving the Su-57 avionics and armaments.

Earlier this year, UAC chief Vadim Badekha said that as production expands, the aircraft will be integrated with newer features.

“The Su-57 platform has been created for a minimum of 40-50 years. It has an open architecture and can use a broad range of technologies with minimal changes to the basic solutions. Su-57 integration with unmanned aerial vehicles will be the central element of future combat systems. In the coming years, new features will be introduced into the serial Su-57 in the framework of the modernization program,” he said.

Additionally, last week, Chief of the Main Staff and First Deputy Commander in Chief of the Russian Aerospace Forces Lieutenant General Alexander Maksimtsev said that the Su-57 fifth-generation fighter has been equipped with hypersonic weapons.

“In accordance with the state defense order, the Aerospace Forces annually receive advanced and modernized weapon systems. The pace of deliveries of fifth-generation Su-57 aircraft is increasing, along with modern aviation strike systems and hypersonic weapons,” the commander reported in an interview.

There is speculation that the hypersonic weapon referred to is an air-launched derivative of the Zircon hypersonic cruise missile. Integrating the Zircon hypersonic cruise missile with the Su-57 will make it a much more lethal platform.

The F-16’s “Felon paint job” suggests that the USAF pilots are finally gearing up to train against the Russian Air Force’s most advanced fighter jet.

Why Choose Tow Truck Software to Grow Your Towing Startup?

You’ve probably noticed that industries like taxi services, e-commerce, delivery, and rentals are getting a lot of attention. But here’s something you might not have realized, towing businesses are also gaining serious traction.

The global towing software market is projected to reach $2.5 billion by 2033, growing at a CAGR of 9.1% from 2026. These projections indicate consistent growth in the years ahead.

As the on-demand roadside assistance service market continues to grow, now is the perfect time to launch your startup in this niche.

Ready to power your towing business? Connect with an experienced development team or explore more about how tow truck software can drive your success!

https://www.trioangle.com/...

#TowSoftware #TowSoftwareUSA #TowSoftwareUAE #FleetTechDubai #RoadsideAppUAE #TowingAppAmerica #TowSoftwareUK #RoadsideRecoveryUK #TowSoftwareSA

🚀 Want to launch your own UberEats-style food delivery app?

Now get it at 50% OFF – ready-made, customizable, and live in just 5 days!

📱 Android + iOS + Admin Panel
🌍 Global launch-ready
🎯 No coding needed

👉 Free Demo: https://www.trioangle.com/...
📞 WhatsApp: +91 6379630152 | salestrioangle.com

#ubereatsclone #fooddeliveryapp #startupoffer #FoodDeliveryBusiness

Serve the Feast While Fans Watch the Game – 50% OFF This July!

Major events like Wimbledon, Tour de France & UEFA Women’s Euro 2025 are driving food delivery spikes!

📱 Launch your own food delivery app with our Deliveroo Clone App at 50% OFF this July!

✅ Multi-restaurant support, real-time tracking & easy menu management.

🎉 Set up in no time and start accepting orders like a pro.
🔥 Hurry — this special offer ends July 31st!
Try It For Free: https://www.trioangle.com/...
Contact: 📩 salestrioangle.com | 📞 +91 6379630152

#FoodDeliveryClone #DeliverooClone #FoodAppScript #OnlineFoodOrdering #ubereatsclone #doordashclone #grubhubclone #postmatesclone #justeatclone #RestaurantApp #ubereatsclone #FoodDeliveryBusiness #LaunchYourApp #JulySpecialOffer #DeliveryTech #wimbledon2025 #TourDeFrance2025 #MLBAllStarGame2025 #UEFAWomensEuro2025 #BritishOpen2025 #UFCFightNight #July2025Events #SportsSeason2025 #EventSeasonDeals #GameDayDelivery

One App – All Deliveries! Grab It at 50% OFF This July!

With July 2025 buzzing with major events like Wimbledon, Tour de France & MLB All-Star Game, multi-category delivery demand is skyrocketing!

🚀 Launch your all-in-one delivery platform with our DeliveryAll Script — now at 50% OFF!

✅ Supports food, grocery, courier & more.
📦 Scalable, customizable & ready for real-world use.

⚡ Don’t miss this event-season offer — valid till July 31st only!

Try It For Free: https://www.trioangle.com/...
Contact: 📩 salestrioangle.com | 📞 +91 6379630152

#DeliveryAllScript #MultiDeliveryApp #AllInOneDelivery #GroceryDeliveryApp #ParcelDeliveryScript #OnDemandApp #SuperAppClone #DeliveryStartup #TechForDelivery #50PercentOff #wimbledon2025 #TourDeFrance2025 #MLBAllStarGame2025 #UEFAWomensEuro2025 #BritishOpen2025 #UFCFightNight #July2025Events #SportsSeason2025 #EventSeasonDeals #GameDayDelivery

July Special: UberEats Clone at 50% OFF — Serve, Celebrate & Win Big!

Perfect time to launch your own food delivery app and engage customers with unique, event-inspired menus!

Why Choose Our UberEats Clone?
Create and schedule event-based menus
Attract customers with live push offers and smart deals
Fully customizable to match any event or festival
Scalable to any market or region

🎁 Limited July Offer: 50% OFF — Only this month!
Try It For Free: https://www.trioangle.com/...
salestrioangle.com | 📞 +91 6379630152

#ubereatsclone #fooddeliveryapp #startupoffer #julyoffer #sportsfanspecial #wimbledon2025 #uefa2025 #tomorrowland2025 #guruPurnima2025 #aquatics2025 #deliverybusiness #LaunchYourApp #50off #festivalspecial

Taiwan’s top envoy to the U.S. urged the Senate to ease tax burdens between the two countries and asked Congress to fast-track foreign military sales, following a closed-door lunch Wednesday with the House.

Ambassador Alexander Tah-Ray Yui, Taipei’s top representative in Washington, told Fox News Digital that he is encouraged that U.S. leaders recognize the urgent existential threat China poses, but emphasized the need to get weapons into the hands of the Taiwanese military more quickly and to address issues impeding two-way investment.

"We appreciate the United States prioritizing Taiwan and helping us strengthen our defense capabilities," Yui said. "We’re cheering on more military commitments to the states and [a] joint effort to speed up the delivery of the products that we bought."

Yui called on the Senate to advance a stalled double taxation agreement, which has already cleared the House.

"That’s an important incentive for Taiwanese companies to come to the United States and invest – but also vice versa for U.S. companies to go to Taiwan," he said. "We are the only one of the large trading partners without this treatment, which is worrying for the whole country right now."

By a vote of 423 to 1, the House last Congress passed the United States-Taiwan Expedited Double-Tax Relief Act, legislation that prevents double taxation on cross-border investments.

The ambassador also offered a sobering assessment of China’s increasingly belligerent posture in the Taiwan Strait and across the Indo-Pacific.

"We are concerned," Yui said. "The [People’s Liberation] Army and Navy are increasing their activities around Taiwan, harassing our territorial waters and airspace. These provocations are constant."

While emphasizing that "we don’t want war," he noted that the U.S. and regional partners have begun ramping up their own defenses, recognizing the threat.

Rep. August Pfluger, who chairs the influential RSC, told Fox News Digital that the meeting was a show of solidarity with Taiwan’s democratic government and a rebuke of China’s authoritarian policies.

"China is an existential threat to Taiwan," said Pfluger, a Texas Republican. "The difference between mainland China and Taiwan is how they treat human life. Taiwan values openness. China suppresses free speech, targets groups like the Uyghur Muslims – it’s deeply concerning."

The lunch meeting, attended by dozens of House Republicans, comes amid rising tensions in the region – but just as President Donald Trump announced a deal with Chinese President Xi Jinping to ease the trade war.

While Pfluger did not commit to further supplemental aid, he said he supports efforts by both nations to strengthen military readiness, including Taiwan’s move to increase defense spending to 3% of GDP.

"It stands to reason that Taiwan increasing their own internal spending on defense, as well as the U.S. recapitalizing our Navy and Air and Space Forces, is vitally important," he said.

Asked what message Congress wants to send to the Taiwanese people, Pfluger was unequivocal:

"We stand by them – as an ally, as a trading partner, as a democracy facing tyranny just next door."

The conversation came at a time when U.S. military officials are warning China is readying for battle in the Indo-Pacific in an effort to "dominate" the region.

"Beijing is preparing for war in the Indo-Pacific as part of its broader strategy to dominate that region and then the world," Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told Congress this week. He added that such an outcome could put the U.S. economy and its supply chains in a choke hold.

"China is undertaking a historic military buildup and actively rehearsing for an invasion of Taiwan," he said.

"These aggressive maneuvers are not routine exercises, they are rehearsals for a forced unification," Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, added in his own testimony.

Taiwan has recently renewed an effort to purge its ranks of Chinese sympathizers, indicting four people on Tuesday suspected of spying for China that had infiltrated the presidential office.

Two Chinese aircraft carriers spotted conducting operations in the Pacific demonstrated the country’s "expansionist" aims, Taiwan Defense Minister Wellington Koo said Wednesday.

"Crossing from the first island chain into the second island chain sends a definite political message and their expansionist nature can be seen," he told reporters in Taipei.

The first island chain refers to the region from Japan to Taiwan and the Philippines to Borneo and the second island chain spreads farther into the Pacific, toward the U.S. territory of Guam.

The Palestinian death toll from the 20-month Israel-Hamas war passed 55,000, the Gaza Health Ministry said Wednesday, and hospitals said at least 21 people were killed while on their way to aid distribution sites.

The circumstances of the deaths reported near the sites were not immediately clear. The Israeli army said Wednesday it fired warning shots in central Gaza toward “suspects” that posed a threat to troops.

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which operates the aid distribution sites, said at least five of its local aid workers were killed in an attack that it blamed on Hamas as they headed to one of the centers.

The Gaza Health Ministry doesn’t distinguish between civilians and combatants, but has said that women and children make up more than half the 55,000 dead. Israel says it only targets militants and blames civilian deaths on Hamas, accusing the militants of hiding among civilians, because they operate in populated areas.

The ministry says 55,104 people have been killed since the start of the war and 127,394 wounded. Many more are believed to be buried under the rubble or in areas that are inaccessible to local medics. The figure did not include Wednesday's deaths.

The Health Ministry is part of Gaza’s Hamas-run government, but staffed by medical professionals who maintain and publish detailed records. Its tolls from previous conflicts have largely aligned with those of independent experts, though Israel has questioned the ministry’s figures.

Also Wednesday, Israel said forces recovered the remains of two additional hostages held in Gaza. Militants still hold 53 captives, less than half of them believed to be alive.

Casualties at separate aid hubs, health officials say.

Health officials in Gaza said 14 people were killed while on their way to collect aid near the southern city of Rafah. Their bodies were taken to Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis. In central Gaza, Al-Awda Hospital said that seven additional people were killed while on their way to an aid distribution site.

The Israeli military said troops fired warning shots before daylight toward people it identified as suspects “who were advancing while posing a threat" in central Gaza. The military had no immediate comment on the reports of casualties in southern Gaza.

Safaa Farmawi said her daughter, Ghazal Eyad, 16, was killed while on her way to collect food in Rafah.

“My daughter and I went to get aid, she came before me, I looked for my daughter but couldn’t find her. People told me your daughter was martyred,” Farmawi told the AP.

Near-daily shootings have erupted as crowds make their way to aid sites run by a newly created aid group rejected by the United Nations. Palestinian witnesses to previous shootings have said Israeli forces fired toward the crowds. The military has acknowledged firing warning shots toward people it says approached its forces in a suspicious manner.

The foundation says there has been no violence in or around the distribution points. It has warned people to stay on the designated routes and recently paused delivery to discuss safety measures with the military.

Foundation says some of its aid workers have been killed.
The GHF accused Hamas of attacking a bus carrying two dozen of its Palestinian workers who helped deliver aid. It said in a statement that at least five people died, multiple others were injured and it fears some may have been taken hostage.

It said the attack happened as the team was heading to one of its aid distribution sites in the area west of Khan Younis.

“Our hearts are broken and our thoughts and prayers are with every victim, every family, and every person still unaccounted for,” the statement said.

New aid system marred by chaos-
The aid system rolled out last month has been marred by chaos and violence, while a longstanding U.N.-run system has struggled to deliver food because of Israeli restrictions and a breakdown of law and order, despite Israel loosening a total blockade it imposed from early March to mid-May.

Experts and human rights workers say hunger is widespread and that the territory of some 2 million Palestinians is at risk of famine if Israel does not fully lift its blockade and halt its military campaign, which it renewed in March after ending a ceasefire with Hamas.

Israel says the new aid distribution system is designed to prevent Hamas from siphoning off aid, but U.N. agencies and major aid groups say there is no evidence of systematic diversion.

They say the new system violates humanitarian principles by allowing Israel to control who receives aid and by encouraging more mass displacement as Palestinians seek access to just three operational sites, two of them in the territory’s southernmost city of Rafah, now a mostly uninhabited military zone.

Israel recovers remains of 2 more hostages

Israeli authorities identified one of the hostages recovered as Yair Yaakov who was killed during the Oct. 7, 2023, attack and whose body was taken into Gaza. His partner and two children were also taken captive and released in a ceasefire deal early in the war.

The second hostage's identity was not disclosed.

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said the bodies were retrieved in a “complex” operation without disclosing details. The Israeli military said they were recovered from Khan Younis.

The war began when Hamas-led militants killed around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, in the Oct. 7 attack and abducted 251 hostages. More than half the captives have been released in ceasefires or other deals. Israeli forces have rescued eight and recovered the remains of dozens more.

Hamas has said it will only release the remaining hostages in return for more Palestinian prisoners, a lasting ceasefire and a complete Israeli withdrawal. It has offered to hand over power to a politically independent Palestinian committee. but has not agreed to disarm.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected those terms, saying that Israel will only agree to temporary ceasefires to facilitate the return of hostages. He has vowed to continue the war until all the hostages are returned and Hamas is defeated or disarmed and sent into exile.

Netanyahu says Israel will control Gaza indefinitely and facilitate what he refers to as the voluntary emigration of much of its population to other countries. The Palestinians and most of the international community reject such plans, viewing them as forcible expulsion that could violate international law.

International pressure has increased again on Israel. Britain, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway say they have imposed sanctions on two far-right Israeli government ministers for allegedly “inciting extremist violence” against Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.

Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich face asset freezes and travel bans. They are champions of expanding Israeli settlements in the West Bank. Settler violence there has spiked since the start of the war in Gaza, where the ministers have been the most vocal in support of hardline policies.

Meanwhile, Israel's navy attacked docks in Yemen’s rebel-held port city of Hodeida, likely damaging facilities that are key to aid shipments to the hungry, war-wracked nation. This is the first time Israeli forces have been involved in attacks against the Iranian-backed Houthis, who have launched missiles and drones targeting Israel during its war on Hamas in Gaza.

Inside Gaza, Palestinian health officials and witnesses said Israeli forces fired toward crowds making their way to a food distribution point run by an Israeli and U.S.-supported group, killing three people and wounding scores.

And Israel deported activists including Greta Thunberg, the Foreign Ministry said, a day after the military seized their Gaza-bound ship protesting Israel's restrictions on aid to the territory.

Here's the latest:

UK and others sanction Israeli ministers for ‘inciting violence against Palestinians’

Britain, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway have imposed sanctions on two far-right Israeli government ministers for allegedly “inciting extremist violence” against Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.

Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich face asset freezes and travel bans from the five countries. They are champions of expanding Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

The five countries’ foreign ministers said Tuesday that Ben-Gvir and Smotrich “have incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights."

Thunberg speaks after Israel deports her.

Activist Greta Thunberg has arrived in France after being deported from Israel. She says the conditions she and other activists faced as they tried to sail to Gaza “are absolutely nothing compared to what people are going through in Palestine and especially Gaza right now.”

Israel seized their boat on Monday. Thunberg says they were well aware of the risks. “The aim was to get to Gaza and to be able to distribute the aid," she said in Paris.

She said the activists would continue trying to get aid to Gaza, where experts have warned of famine under Israeli restrictions on supplies into the territory of over 2 million people.

Israel says the U.K. is sanctioning 2 Cabinet ministers

Israel says it has been informed that the United Kingdom will sanction two of its Cabinet ministers. Foreign Minister Gideon Saar did not provide their names in public remarks.

It appears the sanctions will target Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, two far-right champions of Israeli settlements in Palestinian areas. Ben-Gvir and Smotrich both acknowledged the sanctions on social media, and Smotrich confirmed he was a target.

Israeli police arrest 13-year-old, accuse him of carrying out tasks for Iran

Israeli police arrested a 13-year-old, accusing him of taking money to carry out tasks for Iran.

A statement from the police and the domestic security agency Shin Bet Tuesday said the teen had been contacted on the messaging app Telegram by “Iranian elements,” without elaborating.

Police say the teen, a resident of Tel Aviv, was asked to take pictures of Israel’s missile defense system Iron Dome, a task he did not carry out. They also accuse him of spraying graffiti at the behest of his Telegram contact.

The teen was released on house arrest after being questioned, police said.

Over recent months, Israel has arrested several people in connection with what it says are attempts by Iran and others to pay Israelis to spy on facilities and officials.

Gaza aid ship’s organizers call activist detentions arbitrary

The group behind the Gaza-bound ship that Israel seized says that four of its passengers, including Greta Thunberg, have been deported.

The remaining eight are being detained while waiting to appear before a judge. They are expected to be deported within days.

The Freedom Flotilla Coalition called on the Israeli authorities to release the passengers without deportation. It said their legal team will argue that the ship’s interception was unlawful and the detentions arbitrary. Lawyers will also demand that they be allowed to complete their mission to Gaza, the group said in a statement.

Remains of Thai hostage who was held in Gaza to be flown to Thailand

The Foreign Ministry of Thailand says that the remains of a Thai laborer who was taken hostage by Hamas will be sent back to Thailand on Tuesday.

Nattapong Pinta came to Israel to work in agriculture. Israel’s government said he was seized during Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack from a kibbutz in southern Israel and killed early in the war.

Israel said Saturday it had retrieved his remains in an operation in southern Gaza.

Spanish activist slams Gaza-bound boat’s interception after being deported by Israel

Sergio Toribio, a Spanish activist who was on the Gaza-bound ship seized by Israel, arrived in Barcelona Tuesday after being deported.

Speaking to reporters upon his arrival, he slammed Israel’s interception of the boat.

“It is unforgivable, it is a violation of our rights. It is a pirate attack in international waters.” he said.

He continued: “We weren’t doing anything wrong, we were just carrying provisions as a symbolic gesture.”

Spanish media described Toribio as a 49-year-old ship mechanic.

Israeli military says it intercepted a projectile fired from Gaza Strip

The Israeli military says it intercepted a projectile fired from the northern Gaza Strip that set off air raid sirens in nearby Israeli communities.

There were no reports of casualties or damage.

Rocket fire from Gaza has grown rare as Israel’s 20-month military campaign has depleted the military capabilities of Hamas, which fired thousands of rockets during the Oct. 7, 2023, attack that ignited the war.

Palestinians say Israeli forces fired toward crowd near Gaza aid site, killing 3

Palestinian health officials and witnesses say Israeli forces fired toward crowds making their way to a food distribution point in the Gaza Strip early Tuesday, killing three people.

The Israeli military did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Awda Hospital in central Gaza, which received the casualties, said two men and a child were killed and at least 130 were wounded. The Associated Press spoke to two witnesses who said Israeli forces fired toward the crowds at around 2 a.m. hundreds of meters (yards) from the aid site.

Experts and humanitarian aid workers say Israel’s blockade and military campaign have pushed Gaza to the brink of famine.

Around 130 people have been killed in a number of shootings near aid sites run by a new Israeli and U.S.-backed organization. The Israeli military has acknowledged firing warning shots on previous occasions at people who it says approached its forces in a suspicious manner.

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which runs the sites, says there has been no violence in or around the distribution points themselves. But it has warned people to stay on designated access routes and paused delivery last week while it held talks with the military on improving safety.

French foreign minister says 1 detained French activist signed expulsion order and will leave Israel

French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said Tuesday that one of the detained French activists who was on a Gaza-bound ship intercepted by Israel signed an expulsion order and will leave Israel on Tuesday for France.

The other five refused and will await court decisions in the coming days. In a separate post on X, Barrot said the five will face a “forced expulsion.”

All six received consular visits overnight around 3 a.m., he said, as did the other activists aboard the ship.

The French detainees were transferred overnight to a detention center in the Israeli city of Ramle, he said, and may receive another consular visit there.

Israel deports Greta Thunberg after seizing the ship she was on

Activist Greta Thunberg is being deported from Israel, Israel’s Foreign Ministry said Tuesday, after the Gaza-bound ship she was on was seized by the Israeli military.

In a post on X, the Foreign Ministry shared a photo of Thunberg on a plane, saying that she was headed for France.

Thunberg was one of 12 passengers on board the Madleen, a boat carrying aid destined for people in war-torn Gaza.

The activists said they were protesting the ongoing war and the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Israel says such ships violate its naval blockade of Gaza.

A new Boeing 737 MAX landed back in China on Monday, flight tracking data showed, a sign the U.S. planemaker was resuming deliveries to Chinese customers as Beijing and Washington ease their tariff war.

Boeing, which halted deliveries of new planes to China in April as the world's two largest economies ramped up tariffs on each other, said at the end of May deliveries would resume in June after the tariffs were temporarily scaled back for 90 days.

The plane, painted in the livery of Xiamen Airlines, landed at Boeing's Zhoushan completion centre near China's commercial hub of Shanghai, after leaving Seattle on Saturday, and halting to refuel in Hawaii and Guam as it crossed the Pacific.

Data from tracking app Flightradar24 shows Boeing had originally ferried the craft to Zhoushan in March, before its return to the United States in mid-April, when Chinese airlines stopped taking new Boeing aircraft.
Boeing, Xiamen Airlines and regulator the Civil Aviation Authority of China (CAAC) did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

China represents about 10% of Boeing's commercial backlog and is an important and growing aviation market.

Representatives of China and the United States will meet in London on Monday to discuss a trade deal.

At least three 737 MAX jets were repatriated by Boeing to the United States in April from Zhoushan, where they were to receive final touches before delivery to Chinese carriers. The first to return was the same one that landed on Monday.

Boeing has previously said customers in China would not take delivery of new planes due to tariffs, and it was looking to resell potentially dozens of aircraft.

However the planemaker had not sent the planes elsewhere, despite wanting to cut inventory.

“Arriving In Months”: China’s 5th-Gen Stealth Fighter Ready For Pakistan; To Be Armed With PL-17 Missiles: Media

Pakistan is reportedly all set to induct the Chinese-origin FC-31 fifth-generation stealth fighter to bolster its air power, weeks after the Pakistani Air Force (PAF) engaged in a brief but intense clash with the Indian Air Force.

A senior unidentified Pakistani official told Janes that China will soon begin supplying the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) with its Shenyang FC-31 “Gyrfalcon” multirole stealth fighter aircraft.

The aircraft “will begin arriving within months,” and confirmed that PAF pilots are currently in China training to fly the aircraft, the official stated.

The FC-31 is believed to be the export variant of the J-35A, a fifth-generation stealth aircraft unveiled by China at the Zhuhai Air Show in November 2024.

The official did not reveal when the deal for the aircraft was signed or the specific number of aircraft that Pakistan is acquiring.

According to the publication, another Pakistani government insider informed it in May 2025 that the purchased FC-31 would be fitted with China’s PL-17 air-to-air missile (AAM), which has a range of 400 kilometers.

Islamabad first announced its intention to acquire an unspecified number of stealth fighter jets from China in January 2024. At the time, the then chief of the Pakistan Air Force, Air Chief Marshal Zaheer Ahmed Baber Sidhu, stated that the “foundation for acquiring the J-31 stealth fighter aircraft has already been laid,” and it’s set to become part of the PAF’s fleet shortly.”

Later, in December 2024, another set of reports stated that Islamabad is acquiring approximately 40 J-35A fighters, which are expected to be delivered within 24 months.

None of these reports and claims could be independently verified by the EurAsian Times, and the acquisition has not officially been confirmed by either the Pakistani or Chinese government.

Pakistan is the largest operator of Chinese military equipment outside the country. The PAF earlier inducted the Chinese J-10CE in 2022, an aircraft that was deployed in the conflict with India in May 2025.

The PAF claimed that it downed multiple IAF fighters, including three Rafales, using the deadly combination of J-10CE and PL-15E long-range missiles.

Sources in Pakistan have emphasised that the “success” of the J-10CE has reinforced Pakistan’s faith in Chinese aerospace technology and paved the way for more advanced acquisitions, like that of the FC-31.

Last month, some reports indicated that China was fast-tracking the delivery of the J-35A to Pakistan, following the finalisation of logistics and financing details by Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar during his visit to China immediately after Operation Sindoor.

Notably, the FC-31 will be the first major Chinese military platform that Pakistan will induct after the military clash with India between May 7 and 10. Though it was planned well in advance and does not have a direct link to the conflict, the timing of the potential induction is significant, as a clearer picture of Pakistani military losses is now emerging.

According to reports by Indian media, the IAF destroyed six fighter jets, two high-value surveillance aircraft, one C-130 transport aircraft, over 30 missiles, and several unmanned aerial vehicles during the four-day conflict that ended in a ceasefire in the evening of May 10. The report cited technical analysis of operational data to back its claims.

If these claims are true, the PAF might need to add some serious air power to build capability against the Indian Air Force.

The induction of the Chinese fifth-generation aircraft is believed to be a pivotal moment for the PAF due to the aircraft’s cutting-edge technology and low-observable characteristics.

More notably, the aircraft will be equipped with the PL-17, which boasts a 400-kilometer range, a significant upgrade over the PL-15E that was “allegedly” used by the PAF to down Indian fighter jets.

The FC-31, developed by China’s Shenyang Aircraft Corporation (SAC) under the Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC), is a single-seat, twin-engine, medium-sized fifth-generation fighter that features advanced stealth capabilities, including a low-observable design with forward-swept intake ramps, Diverterless Supersonic Inlet (DSI) bumps, and composite materials to evade L-band and Ku-band radars.

It is powered by WS-19 engines, which provide the aircraft with a thrust of 12 tons. The aircraft features two internal weapon bays, each with a capacity for two medium-range air-to-air missiles, and external hardpoints for various bombs and missiles, including air-to-ground and air-to-surface munitions.

Designed for air superiority, close air support, air interdiction, and precision strikes, the aircraft features an active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar and advanced sensor fusion for enhanced situational awareness.

The induction of this aircraft could tilt the regional balance in Pakistan’s favour, which explains China’s alacrity in exporting the aircraft to Islamabad.

Capability Gap In The Making
The acquisition is seen as a move to counter India’s air force, which currently relies on 4.5-generation fighters like the Rafale and Su-30MKI.

India is currently developing its own fifth-generation Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) program, with the prototype expected to roll out by 2028.

However, if Pakistan starts inducting the FC-31 in the next few months, a glaring capability gap would persist for years until the AMCA is ready for induction.

A ten-year development plan laid down by India, five prototypes, and extensive flight testing are on the cards. However, India’s indigenous aircraft programs are notorious for delays, creating uncertainty and suspicion.

Some experts believe that the acquisition of a Chinese fifth-generation stealth aircraft by Pakistan would pose a threat to India.

A stealth fighter can significantly alter the regional balance. Stealth fighters have a much smaller radar cross section (RCS) than non-stealth fighters. Since fighter detection and tracking are radar-based, the reduced RCS degrades the adversary’s air defense capability.

Indian Air Force veteran and military expert, Squadron Leader Vijainder K. Thakur (retd), earlier argued: “Air defense systems’ performance degrades when operating against stealth fighters because of their lower detection range. While the extent of degradation depends on the effectiveness of stealth shaping, it always occurs.”

“China is known to have developed air-to-air and air-to-ground missiles that will allow the J-35A fighters to launch their weapons before they can be effectively tracked on IAF radars,” he added.

The situation becomes much worse for India, as its other adversary, China, already operates more than 200 J-20 fifth-generation stealth fighters and is now flying two different prototypes of sixth-generation jets, namely the J-36 and J-50.

By the time India operationalises the AMCA, China would have significantly increased its fleet of J-20s and possibly inducted a sixth-generation aircraft. Meanwhile, Pakistan would be operating about 30-40 FC-31. In addition to that, Islamabad is also reportedly participating in the Turkish KAAN fifth-generation aircraft program.

This has already divided the Indian strategic community, with one section asserting that there is a need to buy a fifth-generation aircraft, such as the Su-57, as an interim solution. Several experts have pointed out that the Russian offer could be considered, as it would entail both local production and assistance with the AMCA.

“If India wants to maintain the AMCA program in the long run, it needs an interim fighter, and the Su-57 may be the better choice,” Indian Air Force veteran, Air Marshal Anil Chopra (retd) argued. “It may be worthwhile to quickly build a large inventory of 4.5-generation fighters like LCA Mk2 and Rafale and acquire long-range Air-to-surface missiles (BrahMos II) and longer-range AAMs like Astra III or Russian R-37M.”

However, some former IAF leaders remain skeptical. Former IAF chief RKS Bhadauria recently suggested that India should not import any aircraft and instead focus on the AMCA.

“Now, the government has put its faith in AMCA, and now we need to do everything as a nation to expedite AMCA,” Bhadauria said. “That cause of concern in terms of what Pakistan is going to get from China in the interim — be it J-20 or J-35 — let them get these. That will be studied. What is important is in the interim, how do you handle these threats, and there are ways and means of tackling this threat that they will have.”

For now, it is safe to say that Pakistan is once again beating India to the induction of an advanced next-generation aircraft, a trend that has been visible since the mid-1950s, when the two countries began building their air power.

U.S. Air Force “Shoots Down” U.S. Navy Aircraft Yet Again As Pentagon Prioritizes F-47 Over F/A-XX Program

The US Navy’s next-generation F/A-XX program could face potential delays as the Pentagon has stated that it wants to prioritize the funding of the US Air Force (USAF) F-47 fighter program instead.

The Pentagon wants to prioritize the Air Force’s F-47 stealth fighter over the US Navy’s ambitions to construct its own next-generation jet, arguing that pursuing the two programs simultaneously could cause delays for both, Bloomberg reported.

“Simultaneously pursuing two sixth-generation fighters risks under-delivery on both,” the Department of Defense reportedly said last month to a House and Senate defense policy committee in a request.

The Defense Department requested that the committee divert $500 million from the “accelerated development” of a Navy stealth fighter to the F-47, a contract for which was awarded by President Donald Trump to Boeing in March 2025.

The Pentagon argued that the F-47, “which has full presidential support,” should receive the additional $500 million instead of the US Navy.

“Given the schedule delays and cost growth across numerous airframes, DoD recommends a focus on the F-47, giving the Navy’s F/A-XX program time for technical maturity and development,” the Defense Department stated. “Phasing the F/A-XX after the Air Force’s initial F-47 development will alleviate capacity concerns in the industrial base.”

The latest report comes days after Reuters reported that Congress and the Trump administration were locking horns, causing delays in awarding the contract for the F/A-XX program.

The Navy was earlier poised to award the contract in March, the same month when Boeing received the official green light to build the F-47.

The Trump administration has stated that the F-47 will become operational before the end of Donald Trump’s term in 2029. This may be the reason behind an enhanced push for expansion in funding for the F-47.

Nonetheless, the House Armed Services Committee remains unconvinced by the Pentagon’s argument. Denying the request made by the Pentagon under Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, the committee added the $500 million for the Navy’s F/A-XX in the $3.9 trillion package that was sent to the Senate.

The Senate Armed Services Committee on June 3 unveiled its defense section of the tax, or reconciliation, bill. It includes $750 million to “accelerate the FA/XX aircraft.” The Pentagon request was turned down, although Republicans currently lead the Senate and the House.

Heather Vaughan, a committee spokesperson, said the committee is not on board with the Pentagon’s decision to reroute the funds to the F-47 because the department has not fully explained why that was needed.

The spokesperson noted that the Pentagon “has yet to brief the committee on any changes for its plans to develop and procure the new Navy fighter.

“Absent any new information from the Navy concerning revision to defined capability gaps and shortfalls, mission requirements, cost, or acquisition strategy for F/A-XX, the committee continues to support the development of this critical platform,” she said.

The US Navy requires the F/A-XX to replace the aging F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and EA-18G Growler. After Lockheed Martin withdrew from the program in March, two contractors—Boeing and Northrop Grumman—are competing to build the Navy’s next-generation fighter.

Historically, the US Navy’s fighter jet program has trailed the USAF’s fighter program. For instance, the Navy’s F/A-18E/F Super Hornet faced delays in the 1990s due to budget constraints and debates over its effectiveness, with several members of Congress advising the upgrade of the Hornets instead.

A comparable multirole fighter of the USAF–the F-15E Strike Eagle–entered service in 1989. Meanwhile, the Super Hornet’s first flight was in 1995, and operational capability was achieved in 2001.

These delays were partly caused by the Navy’s desire to strike a balance between carrier-specific requirements and financial constraints.

Later, the F-35 program, managed by the Joint Program Office, prioritized the F-35A and F-35B due to their earlier operational needs and less complex technical requirements compared to the F-35C. In fact, the F-35C carrier variant was the last to achieve Initial Operational Capability (IOC) in 2019, following the F-35A (2016) and the F-35B (2015).

Since the F-35 was already so expensive, the variants might have had to compete for resources. The Marine Corps, which urgently needed to replace its old AV-8B Harriers, and the USAF, which had a larger aircraft inventory and a wider mission scope, were able to induct the aircraft sooner than the Navy. In general, Navy carrier-variant aircraft have some extensive technical modifications tailored to carrier operations.

The Navy’s F-35C, while critical for carrier air wings, relied on F/A-18E/F Super Hornets as a stopgap for a significant amount of time. However, this has since turned around, and the F-35C is now being prioritised for purchase, even by the US Marine Corps.

Having said that, US lawmakers and experts have repeatedly warned against delays in the next-generation fighter jet program, particularly as the threat of conflict with China in the Indo-Pacific remains a constant concern.

F/A-XX Needed In A China Conflict
Last month, Rep. Ken Calvert, R-Calif, the head of the House Appropriations subcommittee on defense, said that “any hesitancy” to move forward with the Navy’s proposed F/A-XX program will leave the service “outmatched” in a future conflict with China, as reported by Breaking Defense at the time.

Speaking at a posture hearing, he said, “We need sixth-generation fighters. The US Navy needs sixth-generation fighters. I’m concerned that any hesitancy on our part to proceed with the planned procurement of the sixth-gen fighters for the Navy will leave us dangerously outmatched in a China fight.”

“We cannot wait,” the appropriator added. “Further, we cannot expect to grow the defense industrial base by undermining it. Aviation programs that rely on highly specialized supply chains and skilled labor cannot be turned on and off like a switch.”

A previous Reuters report stated that postponing contract award by three years “would effectively cancel the program as it is currently defined,” as prices and contracts would expire during that time, almost guaranteeing a new competition.

Though little is known about the fighter jet’s capabilities, it is expected that the aircraft would be able to operate from a carrier deck and have advanced capabilities, including increased range, stealth, and AI integration.

The F/A-XX will be developed with the premise that it will need to travel vast distances in the Indo-Pacific and withstand the rising threat from China’s air defenses. The sixth-generation fighter will be fighting in contested territory.

The US Navy’s Rear Adm. Michael Donnelly had earlier said the design will have a 25% longer range than existing tactical aircraft systems, such as the F/A-18E/F and F-35C. The sixth-generation fighter will be specifically designed to work closely with unmanned aircraft using a control method known as “man-on-the-loop.”

Acting Chief of Naval Operations Adm. James Kilby said on the first day of the Navy-centric Sea Air Space exhibition outside of Washington, DC, that the US Navy requires the F/A-XX just like the USAF. “I mean, we’re talking about a fight in the Pacific. We fight together as a joint force, so having that capability is very important for us,” he added.

Later, speaking at a posture hearing, Kilby said, “The carrier is the most survivable airfield we have, period, and stop. The sixth-gen fighter is the keystone of our air wing of the future.” The aircraft carrier “brings mass volume fires over and over and over again, where a submarine will have to be reloaded and a destroyer will have to be reloaded … and take it offline. That carrier has got sustainment power, and the thing that delivers it is a fifth-gen and sixth-generation fighter into the future.”

While internal discussions rage over the future of the F/A-XX program, which is largely being developed to battle in the Pacific, China has already begun flight testing its two next-generation fighter-like aircraft. One is widely, albeit unofficially, referred to as the J-36, and the other is known as the J-XDS, or J-50.

China is drawing up plans to order hundreds of Airbus planes as Xi Jinping seeks to build closer ties with Europe.

Beijing is in talks with the European aerospace giant to order up to 500 jets against the backdrop of the trade war with the US.

If completed, the order could be announced at a summit in the Chinese capital next month where Xi will host Friedrich Merz, the new German chancellor, and Emmanuel Macron, the president of France, as first reported by Bloomberg.

Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, and Antonio Costa, the EU Council chief, are also expected to attend in a sign of the bloc’s increased willingness to forge a closer relationship with China.

It comes amid heightened trade tensions between China and the US, with Beijing recently banning its airlines from buying jets from Boeing. That followed Donald Trump’s decision to impose aggressive tariffs on China.

The potential 500-plane deal between China and Airbus would pile further pressure on Boeing, which has battled to rebuild its reputation after one of its doors blew out last year.
The proposed agreement would be one of the largest single orders of commercial aircraft ever. The current record is held by Indian airline IndiGo, which ordered 500 Airbus planes in 2023.

It would likely be China’s largest order ever too, overtaking the $37bn (£27bn) spent on 300 Airbus jets three years ago.

The deal highlights China’s lingering dependence on imported planes despite its attempts to build up its own aerospace industry.

The C919, a rival to the 737 developed by local plane maker Comac, has won only a handful of export deals.

Boeing has what it calls a completion and delivery centre in China but no actual production line there.

That is in contrast to Airbus, which operates two final assembly lines for narrow-body jets in the city of Tianjin, 70 miles from Beijing.

China has long sought to limit its trade with Boeing, notably becoming the first country in the world to ground its 737 Max planes in the wake of two deadly crashes involving the jets in 2019.

It was also one of the last to allow the plane to re-enter service, which led some Chinese airlines to abandon orders.

3 Months After Tragic FA-50 Crash, The Philippines Signs Deal For 12 More Fighter Jets, Doubling Its Fleet

Amid rising security challenges in the South China Sea and Beijing’s increasing muscle flexing, the Philippines has decided to double its fleet of South Korean FA-50 fighter jets, signing a contract for 12 additional aircraft, following its initial purchase of 12 jets in 2014.

Notably, the deal was signed despite the Philippines grounding its entire FA-50 fleet earlier this year following the crash of an aircraft during a mission against communist rebels in March, in which two pilots were killed.

With ongoing tensions in the South China Sea (known as the West Philippines Sea in Manila), the Philippines intends to acquire 12 more light aircraft from South Korea at a cost of P40 billion (US$690 million), significantly enhancing its air capability.

However, questions were raised on the capability of the aircraft after the March crash. Now, these questions have been put to rest with the announcement of an additional order for 12 more aircraft.

“The Philippines has signed a contract for 12 more FA-50 fighter jets,” its South Korean manufacturer said on June 4.

Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI) valued the deal with the Department of National Defense at $700 million, with delivery of the jets to be completed by 2030. The Philippines, which has yet to confirm the pact, previously purchased a dozen of the light warplanes in 2014.

In a statement, the South Korean firm said the fighter jets would feature enhanced capabilities including “aerial refueling for extended range, (Active Electronically Scanned Array) radar, and advanced air-to-air and air-to-ground weapons systems”.

One of the Philippines’ original fleet of FA-50s went missing on March 4 while on a mission to provide air support for troops fighting guerrillas in a mountainous area of the southern island of Mindanao.

Rescuers found the wreckage of the plane and the bodies of two crewmen a day later.

After temporarily grounding the fleet, the Philippine Air Force ruled out any mechanical problems with the aircraft.

Air Force spokeswoman Maria Consuelo Castillo told a press conference in April that a confluence of factors had contributed to the crash, including mountainous terrain and visibility issues.

Castillo said in March that the purchase of additional FA-50s was under consideration by the defence department.

The Philippines has extensively used its FA-50 fleet in the fight against the Islamic State in 2017, called the “Marawi Siege,” and it was dubbed a “game changer” by the PAF officials. Currently, the fighter jets are also used in operations against the Communist rebels.

The Philippines is also using the jets in patrolling missions in the contested South China Sea.

In February this year, the Philippines’ FA-50 fighter jet fleet also took part in drills over the West Philippine Sea with the US B-1 “Lancer” bombers.

The exercise included maneuvering the aircraft within the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone (EEZ). The exercise aimed to strengthen interoperability between the two air forces, enhance air domain awareness, and improve agile combat employment capabilities.

The FA-50, a modern light combat aircraft, represents the PAF’s first line of defense in maintaining air superiority over the contested areas.

The latest FA-50 purchase comes at a time when the Philippines has virtually been pushed to the wall in the South China Sea. China has been conducting aggressive maneuvers against Filipino forces in disputed territories, occasionally assaulting and expelling them from waters that China considers its “territorial waters.”

Currently, the FA-50 is the only combat-capable aircraft in the PAF’s inventory. In fact, the service had earlier considered deploying the FA-50 to escort its patrol aircraft over the South China Sea last year. The FA-50 is based on the T-50, a trainer aircraft capable of supersonic flight that was modified from the F-16 to train pilots for the KF-16 and F-15K.

The FA-50 is predominantly designed for air defense, strike, and jet training missions.

Expanding Military Shopping List Of The Philippines
Manila is rapidly modernizing its armed forces to deter China and enhance its combat capability. The Philippines Department of National Defense (DND) earlier stated that it plans to buy 40 multi-role fighter jets, among other sophisticated weapon systems. Two aircraft have been offered to the country: the Saab Gripen-E and Lockheed Martin’s F-16 Block 70/72.

Notably, the latest FA-50 acquisition comes amid warnings from military analysts that the PAF is arguably the country’s least robust military component, highlighting the need for at least a dozen squadrons of multirole jets to protect the archipelago’s airspace effectively.

Earlier, the Philippines’ DND also confirmed that a P6.5 billion (US$110 million) deal for six Embraer Super Tucano light attack aircraft for the PAF’s 15th Strike Wing was signed in December 2024. The purchase is meant to reinforce the PAF fleet in the wake of the gap left by the decommissioning of the last two remaining Rockwell OV-10 Bronco light attack aircraft and two AH-1S Cobra attack helicopters.

In addition, the DND has announced the P1 billion (US$17 million) purchase of an aeromedical Bell 412 EPX helicopter for the Philippine Army’s use in emergency medical missions.

The country has also planned upgrades for various cyber systems of the Armed Forces of the Philippines, as well as enhancements for the PAF’s ground-based air defense system and the introduction of new missiles.

In addition to the above-mentioned systems, the Philippines is reportedly considering the purchase of nine BrahMos missile batteries for its Army.

If finalized, this would be Manila’s second order of the BrahMos missile. In 2022, the Philippines signed a US$375 million deal with India for three batteries of the shore-based, anti-ship variant of the BrahMos missile for its naval forces.

Last year, Manila said it wanted to acquire the US Typhon mid-range missile system to bolster external defense capabilities.

Cornered by the PLA forces in the South China Sea, Manila is committed to spending at least 1.894 trillion pesos (approximately US$33.74 billion) to modernize and enhance its military capabilities by acquiring new systems, upgrading existing ones, and improving military infrastructure.

The deal for 12 additional FA-50 fighter jets will add crucial capabilities to the PAF.

“Sitting Ducks” For Ukraine! How 2010 U.S.-Russia Treaty Helped Kyiv’s UAVs Destroy Russian Nuclear Bombers?

On June 1, the world witnessed the Kalashnikov moment of Drone Warfare. While military watchers had been warning for some time that drone warfare had arrived, if anyone had any doubts, they were cleared in the spectacular Ukrainian drone attack on Russian airbases that might have knocked out 34% of its long-range strategic bomber fleet.

By smuggling 117 low-cost FPV drones into Russia, Ukraine claims that it has destroyed 41 Russian strategic bombers, including the Tu-95, Tu-160, Tu-22, and AEW&C A-50.

Kyiv claims that Russian losses amount to over USD 7 billion.

However, ever since the spectacular videos of the flimsy, low-cost drones rising vertically from trucks and destroying strategic bombers parked in open in Russian air bases appeared on social media, many people are questioning why long-range bombers, worth millions of dollars and part of the Russian nuclear triad, were parked in the open like sitting ducks with little to no protection?

Moreover, long-range bombers like the Tu-22 and Tu-95 are Soviet-era legacy aircraft that are no longer in production, which enhances their strategic value and makes replacement nearly impossible.

Despite this strategic significance, why these high-value targets were not parked in shelters is a question that is bewildering many.

In fact, rather than being parked in shelters or under well-protected concrete structures, these aircraft were parked in plain sight of satellites, on open tarmac in clearly marked bays, making them easily detectable by US/NATO spy satellites.

As strange as it may sound, Russian bombers could have been parked in the open for exactly this reason: so that they can be spotted or detected by US satellites.

In the aftermath of the Ukrainian strikes, many people, including military veterans, pointed out on social media that nuclear-capable bombers are to be parked in the open under the obligations of a bilateral treaty with the US.

New START Treaty & Implications For Heavy Bombers
Former US Army lieutenant general Michael Flynn, who also served as the 24th national security advisor under the first Trump administration, noted that the Russian bombers could have been parked in the open due to nuclear treaty obligations.

“FYI, those bombers that were hit HAVE to be out in full view due to nuclear treaty obligations. Zelenskyy took advantage of that,” General Flynn noted on X.

His post generated heated discussions on social media about whether Russian obligations under a bilateral treaty with the US might have helped Ukraine in targeting the Russian strategic bombers.

The nuclear treaty General Flynn was referring to was the New START Treaty signed between the US and Russia in 2010.

The bilateral treaty was signed to reduce and limit strategic nuclear arsenals of the United States and Russia, enhancing global security and stability. Signed on April 8, 2010, in Prague by U.S. President Barack Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, it replaced the expired START I treaty and the 2002 Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty (SORT).

The treaty aimed to reduce nuclear arsenals and enhance verification and transparency.

It set verifiable limits, capping deployed strategic nuclear warheads at 1,550, deployed intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), and heavy bombers at 700, and total deployed and non-deployed launchers at 800.

The treaty also established a robust inspection and verification regime, including on-site inspections, data exchanges, and telemetry sharing, to ensure compliance and build trust between the two nations, which hold over 90% of the world’s nuclear weapons.

The treaty covers ICBMs, SLBMs, and heavy bombers. The Russian Tu-160 and Tu-95 are both covered under the category of heavy bombers and are mentioned explicitly in the treaty.

Article 8, clause C of the treaty states that existing types of heavy bombers are:

For the United States of America, the B-52G, B-52H, B-IB, and B-2A.
For the Russian Federation, the Tu-95MS and Tu-160.
Further, Article IV of the treaty states that

Each Party shall:

(a) Deploy launchers of ICBMs only at ICBM bases;

(b) Deploy heavy bombers only at air bases.

There are many other restrictions on Heavy bombers in the treaty. For instance:

“Each Party shall base test heavy bombers only at heavy bomber flight test centers. Non-deployed heavy bombers other than test heavy bombers shall be located only at repair facilities or production facilities for heavy bombers.”

“Each Party shall not carry out at an air base joint basing of heavy bombers equipped for nuclear armaments and heavy bombers equipped for non-nuclear armaments, unless otherwise agreed by the Parties.”

Also, “Strategic offensive arms shall not be located at eliminated facilities except during their movement through such facilities and during visits of heavy bombers at such facilities.”

Under the treaty, both parties also need to release data on deployed nuclear warheads on strategic bombers, as well as on non-deployed strategic bombers.

For the sake of verification and transparency, both parties were given the right to inspect each other’s nuclear-capable assets. The inspection involves both on-site and off-site inspections.

It is clear that under this treaty, both sides have to release data on the number of nuclear-capable heavy bombers, as well as on their locations. Furthermore, there are restrictions on where these heavy bombers can or cannot be placed. Both parties have the right to inspect and verify the authenticity of the provided data.

The protocols for inspection further state that “heavy bombers shall be photographed without tarpaulins or covers.”

Another important clause in the treaty puts the obligation for “Non‑Interference with National Technical Means (NTM).”

“The treaty permits the use of national technical means of verification (e.g., satellites) in a manner consistent with international law, and contains explicit provisions that prohibit interference with NTM and the use of concealment measures that may impede monitoring by NTM.”

The verification by means of satellites meant that the heavy bombers were often parked in the open, in full glare of spy satellites.

So, while the treaty does not explicitly demand that the heavy bombers be parked outside, this became a usual practice.

“Russia, like the US, often leaves long-range bombers parked outside and easily visible, both for operational reasons and as part of nuclear-treaty obligations,” the Wall Street Journal reported.

The treaty also means that the data on the number of heavy bombers and their location is often publicly available.

However, it is worth noting that Russia suspended its participation in the New START treaty in February 2023. Still, the old treaty will remain in force, at least legally, until February 5, 2026.

So, it is clear that Russia was not obligated to park its heavy bombers in the open. However, the terms of the treaty and its complex inspection protocols meant that it became the usual practice.

In fact, not just Russia, even the US often parks its strategic bombers in the open.

The spectacular Ukrainian attack and the devastating blow it has delivered to the Russian heavy bomber fleet are a wake-up call not just to Moscow but to the US as well.

“Very costly U.S. Strategic Bombers can be taken out in the same way by anyone with access to inexpensive drones, delivery trucks, explosives, and a bit of technical knowledge (not good and new tactics will now have to be developed).”

“People, and especially world leaders, need to realize the global implications to such an operation as Ukraine just pulled off,” former US General Flynn warned in his post.

“Alleged” Chinese Laser Weapon Spotted In Russia Very Similar To One Deployed In Iran; Is Beijing Arming Moscow?

A day before all hell broke loose over Russian airfields with a shocking Ukrainian drone attack that destroyed multiple strategic bombers, some pro-Russian military sources published the video of what is believed to be a Chinese-origin anti-drone laser system operating in Russia.

The alleged Chinese system was spotted in a video initially posted to the Military Information Telegram channel. It has now been shared extensively on X.

The video opens with a shot of Russian troops operating the system and pressing some tabs. Then, the frame shifts to laser system testing against a steel plate, followed by footage of the shooting down of unidentified Ukrainian drones.

Social media has since been replete with claims that the system in question is named ‘Low-Altitude Laser Defending System’ (LASS) and has been provided to the Russians by China.

The LASS is also reportedly known as the Silent Hunter. It is a turret-mounted platform equipped with optical targeting sensors and a 10 kW laser, believed to be developed by the Chinese Academy of Engineering Physics.

If true, the video would be the first documented instance of the Chinese laser system being used operationally against Ukraine.

The Telegram channel gave no information on when the video was taken. However, it noted that the technology is currently being operated by the Nomad special forces squad.

The EurAsian Times could not independently corroborate these claims, and China has categorically denied providing offensive weapons to Russia for use against Ukraine.

There is no official confirmation by either side.

Nonetheless, several military observers have noted that the system shown in the video bears an uncanny resemblance to the laser system that China had earlier delivered to Iran.

In October last year, a Chinese laser counter-drone system–identified as Shen Nung– was spotted in Tehran, Iran, during a sermon given by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

The system was spotted days after Iran launched missiles and a drone strike on Israel, and was likely deployed to protect the Supreme Leader from a potential Israeli attack at the time, as previously reported.

Fabian Hinz, a research fellow for Defense and Military Analysis at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, also noted that the system spotted in Russia appears to be a Chinese Shen Nung 3000/5000.

Hinz commented: “While the sensor arrangement seems to have been altered, the system observed in Russian service strongly resembles the Chinese Shen Nung 3000/5000 anti-drone laser.” “The Shen Nung system comes in both vehicle-mounted and containerized variants, and has previously been exported to Iran,” he added.

It is difficult to determine whether the system depicted in the video is a Silent Hunter or a Shen Nung.

As previously reported by the EurAsian Times, Shen Nung’s radar can identify drones from a distance of up to five kilometers. The system’s laser has a power range of 10 to 20 kW and can fire non-destructive, “dazzling” or blinding attacks over a distance of more than three kilometers. It can also really destroy some objects that approach within 1.5 kilometers.

The Shen Nung 5000 and 3000, which are containerized and 4×4 Dongfeng Mengshi light tactical truck-mounted versions of the Shen Nung, have also been shown off by China in the past.

The system seen in the Telegram video could be a variant of Shen Nung or a separate system based on it. These remain mere conjectures due to the paucity of information, and Russia is not officially known to have a system that resembles Shen Nung.

The substantial expenses associated with intercepting drones and missiles have led to an increased focus on laser-based systems in modern warfare. Typically, laser-based counter-drone systems employ a high-powered beam to engage targets at a significantly lower cost than air defense missiles, which can cost millions of dollars.

Additionally, lasers can discreetly incinerate adversarial targets without inflicting collateral damage, thereby reducing casualties. The video published by the Telegram channel suggests that the system works well against drones, unlike the spotting in Iran, where the system was photographed in the background, not in action.

“Previously, there was an opinion in the domestic information environment that combat lasers were useless and expensive toys,” the Military Informant Telegram channel wrote. “However, new threats identified during the full-on invasion of Ukraine forced the search for alternative methods of counteraction. Thanks to the development of new technologies, laser systems have become an effective tool for the destruction of Ukrainian UAVs.”

Russia has also been working on incorporating lasers into its combat capabilities. The country was earlier believed to have two different laser weapons in its arsenal, the Persevet and Zadira.

However, there is not much information about their use in combat. In August 2023, the Russian news agency RIA Novosti reported that Russia had conducted successful field tests of an unnamed laser gun, destroying several drones of various types.

In a separate development earlier this year, First Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation, Denis Manturov, announced that the Pantsir air defense system will soon be outfitted with a laser complex as part of ongoing modernization efforts.

Ironically, the video of the alleged Chinese laser system was posted just a day before Ukraine launched an audacious drone attack under ‘Operation Spiderweb,’ and allegedly destroyed 40 Russian aircraft or 34% of Russia’s strategic cruise missile carriers.

Ukraine’s security service has put the estimated cost of losses at $7 billion. The drone attacks were launched from trucks that were smuggled deep inside the Russian territory. The attack was so bad that some pro-Russian military bloggers called it the country’s “Pearl Harbor.”

China Denies Arms Delivery To Russia
Citing reporting by Ukrainian security and intelligence agencies, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in April accused China of supplying weapons to Russia, including gunpowder and artillery. He also told the media that Chinese representatives were involved in weapons production on Russian territory.

“We have finally received information that China is supplying weapons to the Russian Federation. … We believe that Chinese representatives are engaged in the production of some weapons on Russian territory … We see the cooperation between these two countries in this area, and we must acknowledge it is happening,” the President was quoted.

The claims were dismissed as “groundless” by the Chinese Foreign Ministry. “China’s position on the Ukrainian issue has always been clear,” foreign ministry spokesperson Lin Jian told a regular news conference at the time. “It has been actively committed to promoting a ceasefire and ending the conflict, as well as encouraging peace talks.”

More recently, the head of Ukraine’s foreign intelligence service, Oleh Ivashchenko, said in an interview on May 26 that he could confirm China is supplying critical materials and equipment to about 20 Russian military factories. “There is information that China supplies tooling machines, special chemical products, gunpowder, and components specifically to defence manufacturing industries,” he said. Thus, assisting production of weapons, particularly drones, in Russia.

Reports from Ukraine’s Foreign Intelligence Service and other sources have noted on multiple occasions that China supplies up to 80% of the electronics used in Russian drones, including critical components like machine tools, special chemicals, and gunpowder for ammunition production. These are often dual-use items, which China claims are for civilian purposes but are repurposed for military use.

Last year, an intelligence assessment released by the Biden administration had also made overarching claims about Chinese military assistance to Russia, particularly in the supply of microelectronics, which are used in the production of missiles, tanks, aircraft, and other weaponry used against Ukraine.

The transfer of high-value equipment, such as a laser anti-drone system, from China to Russia is not documented. The latest video could be direct evidence of China arming Russian forces if the system is verified to be Chinese.